Cargando…

Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effect of airflow rate on amplitude of lung sound energy and regional distribution of lung sounds may assist in the interpretation of computerized acoustic measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of airflow rate on Vibration Response Imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yosef, Meirav, Langer, Ruben, Lev, Shaul, Glickman, Yael A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834576
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010116
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effect of airflow rate on amplitude of lung sound energy and regional distribution of lung sounds may assist in the interpretation of computerized acoustic measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of airflow rate on Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) measurement in healthy lungs. METHODS: Lung sounds were recorded from 20 healthy adults in the frequency range of 150-250 Hz using 40 piezoelectric sensors positioned on the posterior chest wall. During the recordings, subjects were breathing at airflow rates ranging between 0.3 and 1.7L/s. Online visual feedback was provided using a pneumotach mouthpiece. RESULTS: Amplitude of lung sound energy significantly increased with increasing airflow rate (p<0.00001, Friedman test). A strong relationship (R2=0.95) was obtained between amplitude of lung sound energy at peak inspiration and airflow rate raised to the third power. This correlation did not significantly affect normalized lung sound distribution maps at peak inspiration, especially when airflow was higher than 1.0L/s. Acoustic maps obtained at airflow rates below 0.7L/s differed from those recorded above 1.0L/s (p<0.05, Wilcoxon matched-paired signed-ranks test). CONCLUSION: These findings may be of importance when comparing healthy and diseased lungs or when monitoring changes in lung sounds during treatment follow-up.