Cargando…

Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effect of airflow rate on amplitude of lung sound energy and regional distribution of lung sounds may assist in the interpretation of computerized acoustic measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of airflow rate on Vibration Response Imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yosef, Meirav, Langer, Ruben, Lev, Shaul, Glickman, Yael A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834576
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010116
_version_ 1782172843856887808
author Yosef, Meirav
Langer, Ruben
Lev, Shaul
Glickman, Yael A
author_facet Yosef, Meirav
Langer, Ruben
Lev, Shaul
Glickman, Yael A
author_sort Yosef, Meirav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effect of airflow rate on amplitude of lung sound energy and regional distribution of lung sounds may assist in the interpretation of computerized acoustic measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of airflow rate on Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) measurement in healthy lungs. METHODS: Lung sounds were recorded from 20 healthy adults in the frequency range of 150-250 Hz using 40 piezoelectric sensors positioned on the posterior chest wall. During the recordings, subjects were breathing at airflow rates ranging between 0.3 and 1.7L/s. Online visual feedback was provided using a pneumotach mouthpiece. RESULTS: Amplitude of lung sound energy significantly increased with increasing airflow rate (p<0.00001, Friedman test). A strong relationship (R2=0.95) was obtained between amplitude of lung sound energy at peak inspiration and airflow rate raised to the third power. This correlation did not significantly affect normalized lung sound distribution maps at peak inspiration, especially when airflow was higher than 1.0L/s. Acoustic maps obtained at airflow rates below 0.7L/s differed from those recorded above 1.0L/s (p<0.05, Wilcoxon matched-paired signed-ranks test). CONCLUSION: These findings may be of importance when comparing healthy and diseased lungs or when monitoring changes in lung sounds during treatment follow-up.
format Text
id pubmed-2761668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27616682009-10-15 Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs Yosef, Meirav Langer, Ruben Lev, Shaul Glickman, Yael A Open Respir Med J Article BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effect of airflow rate on amplitude of lung sound energy and regional distribution of lung sounds may assist in the interpretation of computerized acoustic measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of airflow rate on Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) measurement in healthy lungs. METHODS: Lung sounds were recorded from 20 healthy adults in the frequency range of 150-250 Hz using 40 piezoelectric sensors positioned on the posterior chest wall. During the recordings, subjects were breathing at airflow rates ranging between 0.3 and 1.7L/s. Online visual feedback was provided using a pneumotach mouthpiece. RESULTS: Amplitude of lung sound energy significantly increased with increasing airflow rate (p<0.00001, Friedman test). A strong relationship (R2=0.95) was obtained between amplitude of lung sound energy at peak inspiration and airflow rate raised to the third power. This correlation did not significantly affect normalized lung sound distribution maps at peak inspiration, especially when airflow was higher than 1.0L/s. Acoustic maps obtained at airflow rates below 0.7L/s differed from those recorded above 1.0L/s (p<0.05, Wilcoxon matched-paired signed-ranks test). CONCLUSION: These findings may be of importance when comparing healthy and diseased lungs or when monitoring changes in lung sounds during treatment follow-up. Bentham Open 2009-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2761668/ /pubmed/19834576 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010116 Text en © Yosef et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Yosef, Meirav
Langer, Ruben
Lev, Shaul
Glickman, Yael A
Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title_full Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title_fullStr Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title_short Effect of Airflow Rate on Vibration Response Imaging in Normal Lungs
title_sort effect of airflow rate on vibration response imaging in normal lungs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834576
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010116
work_keys_str_mv AT yosefmeirav effectofairflowrateonvibrationresponseimaginginnormallungs
AT langerruben effectofairflowrateonvibrationresponseimaginginnormallungs
AT levshaul effectofairflowrateonvibrationresponseimaginginnormallungs
AT glickmanyaela effectofairflowrateonvibrationresponseimaginginnormallungs