Cargando…

A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences

BACKGROUND: The policy drive for the UK National Health Service (NHS) has focused on the need for high quality services informed by evidence of best practice. The introduction of care pathways and protocols to standardise care and support implementation of evidence into practice has taken place acro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bick, Debra E, Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Fontenla, Marina
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19804624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-47
_version_ 1782172858433142784
author Bick, Debra E
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Fontenla, Marina
author_facet Bick, Debra E
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Fontenla, Marina
author_sort Bick, Debra E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The policy drive for the UK National Health Service (NHS) has focused on the need for high quality services informed by evidence of best practice. The introduction of care pathways and protocols to standardise care and support implementation of evidence into practice has taken place across the NHS with limited evaluation of their impact. A multi-site case study evaluation was undertaken to assess the impact of use of care pathways and protocols on clinicians, service users and service delivery. One of the five sites was a midwifery-led Birth Centre, where an adapted version of the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Birth had been implemented. METHODS: The overarching framework was realistic evaluation. A case study design enabled the capture of data on use of the pathway in the clinical setting, use of multiple methods of data collection and opportunity to study and understand the experiences of clinicians and service users whose care was informed by the pathway. Women attending the Birth Centre were recruited at their 36 week antenatal visit. Episodes of care during labour were observed, following which the woman and the midwife who cared for her were interviewed about use of the pathway. Interviews were also held with other key stakeholders from the study site. Qualitative data were content analysed. RESULTS: Observations were undertaken of four women during labour. Eighteen interviews were conducted with clinicians and women, including the women whose care was observed and the midwives who cared for them, senior midwifery managers and obstetricians. The implementation of the pathway resulted in a number of anticipated benefits, including increased midwifery confidence in skills to support normal birth and promotion of team working. There were also unintended consequences, including concerns about a lack of documentation of labour care and negative impact on working relationships with obstetric and other midwifery colleagues. Women were unaware their care was informed by a care pathway. CONCLUSION: Care pathways are complex interventions which generate a number of consequences for practice. Those considering introduction of pathways need to ensure all relevant stakeholders are engaged with this and develop robust evaluation strategies to accompany implementation.
format Text
id pubmed-2761848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27618482009-10-15 A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences Bick, Debra E Rycroft-Malone, Jo Fontenla, Marina BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The policy drive for the UK National Health Service (NHS) has focused on the need for high quality services informed by evidence of best practice. The introduction of care pathways and protocols to standardise care and support implementation of evidence into practice has taken place across the NHS with limited evaluation of their impact. A multi-site case study evaluation was undertaken to assess the impact of use of care pathways and protocols on clinicians, service users and service delivery. One of the five sites was a midwifery-led Birth Centre, where an adapted version of the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Birth had been implemented. METHODS: The overarching framework was realistic evaluation. A case study design enabled the capture of data on use of the pathway in the clinical setting, use of multiple methods of data collection and opportunity to study and understand the experiences of clinicians and service users whose care was informed by the pathway. Women attending the Birth Centre were recruited at their 36 week antenatal visit. Episodes of care during labour were observed, following which the woman and the midwife who cared for her were interviewed about use of the pathway. Interviews were also held with other key stakeholders from the study site. Qualitative data were content analysed. RESULTS: Observations were undertaken of four women during labour. Eighteen interviews were conducted with clinicians and women, including the women whose care was observed and the midwives who cared for them, senior midwifery managers and obstetricians. The implementation of the pathway resulted in a number of anticipated benefits, including increased midwifery confidence in skills to support normal birth and promotion of team working. There were also unintended consequences, including concerns about a lack of documentation of labour care and negative impact on working relationships with obstetric and other midwifery colleagues. Women were unaware their care was informed by a care pathway. CONCLUSION: Care pathways are complex interventions which generate a number of consequences for practice. Those considering introduction of pathways need to ensure all relevant stakeholders are engaged with this and develop robust evaluation strategies to accompany implementation. BioMed Central 2009-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2761848/ /pubmed/19804624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-47 Text en Copyright © 2009 Bick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bick, Debra E
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Fontenla, Marina
A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title_full A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title_fullStr A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title_full_unstemmed A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title_short A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
title_sort case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one english birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19804624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-47
work_keys_str_mv AT bickdebrae acasestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences
AT rycroftmalonejo acasestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences
AT fontenlamarina acasestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences
AT bickdebrae casestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences
AT rycroftmalonejo casestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences
AT fontenlamarina casestudyevaluationofimplementationofacarepathwaytosupportnormalbirthinoneenglishbirthcentreanticipatedbenefitsandunintendedconsequences