Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal

BACKGROUND: Data from HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings show extensive rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU) ranging from 5% to 40% within 6 mo of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Our objective was to project the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of interventions to preven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Losina, Elena, Touré, Hapsatou, Uhler, Lauren M., Anglaret, Xavier, Paltiel, A. David, Balestre, Eric, Walensky, Rochelle P., Messou, Eugène, Weinstein, Milton C., Dabis, François, Freedberg, Kenneth A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19859538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000173
_version_ 1782172882963529728
author Losina, Elena
Touré, Hapsatou
Uhler, Lauren M.
Anglaret, Xavier
Paltiel, A. David
Balestre, Eric
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Messou, Eugène
Weinstein, Milton C.
Dabis, François
Freedberg, Kenneth A.
author_facet Losina, Elena
Touré, Hapsatou
Uhler, Lauren M.
Anglaret, Xavier
Paltiel, A. David
Balestre, Eric
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Messou, Eugène
Weinstein, Milton C.
Dabis, François
Freedberg, Kenneth A.
author_sort Losina, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data from HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings show extensive rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU) ranging from 5% to 40% within 6 mo of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Our objective was to project the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent LTFU from HIV care in West Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC) International model to project the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of LTFU-prevention programs from a payer perspective. These programs include components such as eliminating ART co-payments, eliminating charges to patients for opportunistic infection-related drugs, improving personnel training, and providing meals and reimbursing for transportation for participants. The efficacies and costs of these interventions were extensively varied in sensitivity analyses. We used World Health Organization criteria of <3× gross domestic product per capita (3× GDP per capita = US$2,823 for Côte d'Ivoire) as a plausible threshold for “cost-effectiveness.” The main results are based on a reported 18% 1-y LTFU rate. With full retention in care, projected per-person discounted life expectancy starting from age 37 y was 144.7 mo (12.1 y). Survival losses from LTFU within 1 y of ART initiation ranged from 73.9 to 80.7 mo. The intervention costing US$22/person/year (e.g., eliminating ART co-payment) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 12%. An intervention costing US$77/person/year (inclusive of all the components described above) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that prevent LTFU in resource-limited settings would substantially improve survival and would be cost-effective by international criteria with efficacy of at least 12%–41%, depending on the cost of intervention, based on a reported 18% cumulative incidence of LTFU at 1 y after ART initiation. The commitment to start ART and treat HIV in these settings should include interventions to prevent LTFU. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Text
id pubmed-2762030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27620302009-10-27 Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal Losina, Elena Touré, Hapsatou Uhler, Lauren M. Anglaret, Xavier Paltiel, A. David Balestre, Eric Walensky, Rochelle P. Messou, Eugène Weinstein, Milton C. Dabis, François Freedberg, Kenneth A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Data from HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings show extensive rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU) ranging from 5% to 40% within 6 mo of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Our objective was to project the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent LTFU from HIV care in West Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC) International model to project the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of LTFU-prevention programs from a payer perspective. These programs include components such as eliminating ART co-payments, eliminating charges to patients for opportunistic infection-related drugs, improving personnel training, and providing meals and reimbursing for transportation for participants. The efficacies and costs of these interventions were extensively varied in sensitivity analyses. We used World Health Organization criteria of <3× gross domestic product per capita (3× GDP per capita = US$2,823 for Côte d'Ivoire) as a plausible threshold for “cost-effectiveness.” The main results are based on a reported 18% 1-y LTFU rate. With full retention in care, projected per-person discounted life expectancy starting from age 37 y was 144.7 mo (12.1 y). Survival losses from LTFU within 1 y of ART initiation ranged from 73.9 to 80.7 mo. The intervention costing US$22/person/year (e.g., eliminating ART co-payment) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 12%. An intervention costing US$77/person/year (inclusive of all the components described above) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that prevent LTFU in resource-limited settings would substantially improve survival and would be cost-effective by international criteria with efficacy of at least 12%–41%, depending on the cost of intervention, based on a reported 18% cumulative incidence of LTFU at 1 y after ART initiation. The commitment to start ART and treat HIV in these settings should include interventions to prevent LTFU. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2009-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2762030/ /pubmed/19859538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000173 Text en Losina et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Losina, Elena
Touré, Hapsatou
Uhler, Lauren M.
Anglaret, Xavier
Paltiel, A. David
Balestre, Eric
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Messou, Eugène
Weinstein, Milton C.
Dabis, François
Freedberg, Kenneth A.
Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
title_sort cost-effectiveness of preventing loss to follow-up in hiv treatment programs: a côte d'ivoire appraisal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19859538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000173
work_keys_str_mv AT losinaelena costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT tourehapsatou costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT uhlerlaurenm costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT anglaretxavier costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT paltieladavid costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT balestreeric costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT walenskyrochellep costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT messoueugene costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT weinsteinmiltonc costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT dabisfrancois costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT freedbergkennetha costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal
AT costeffectivenessofpreventinglosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsacotedivoireappraisal