Cargando…
Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009 |
_version_ | 1782172917203730432 |
---|---|
author | Uglesich, Robert Casti, Alex Hayot, Fernand Kaplan, Ehud |
author_facet | Uglesich, Robert Casti, Alex Hayot, Fernand Kaplan, Ehud |
author_sort | Uglesich, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley, 1984). Recent studies, which used stimuli restricted to the receptive field (RF) center, show that despite the great loss of spikes, more than half of the information carried by the RGC discharge is typically preserved in the LGN discharge (Sincich et al., 2009), suggesting that the retinal spikes that are deleted by the LGN carry less information than those that are transmitted to the cortex. To determine how LGN relay neurons decide which retinal spikes to respond to, we recorded extracellularly from the cat LGN relay cell spikes together with the slow synaptic (‘S’) potentials that signal the firing of retinal spikes. We investigated the influence of the inhibitory surround of the LGN RF by stimulating the eyes with spots of various sizes, the largest of which covered the center and surround of the LGN relay cell's RF. We found that for stimuli that activated mostly the RF center, each LGN spike delivered more information than the retinal spike, but this difference was reduced as stimulus size increased to cover the RF surround. To evaluate the optimality of the LGN editing of retinal spikes, we created artificial spike trains from the retinal ones by various deletion schemes. We found that single LGN cells transmitted less information than an optimal detector could. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2762372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27623722009-10-16 Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus Uglesich, Robert Casti, Alex Hayot, Fernand Kaplan, Ehud Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley, 1984). Recent studies, which used stimuli restricted to the receptive field (RF) center, show that despite the great loss of spikes, more than half of the information carried by the RGC discharge is typically preserved in the LGN discharge (Sincich et al., 2009), suggesting that the retinal spikes that are deleted by the LGN carry less information than those that are transmitted to the cortex. To determine how LGN relay neurons decide which retinal spikes to respond to, we recorded extracellularly from the cat LGN relay cell spikes together with the slow synaptic (‘S’) potentials that signal the firing of retinal spikes. We investigated the influence of the inhibitory surround of the LGN RF by stimulating the eyes with spots of various sizes, the largest of which covered the center and surround of the LGN relay cell's RF. We found that for stimuli that activated mostly the RF center, each LGN spike delivered more information than the retinal spike, but this difference was reduced as stimulus size increased to cover the RF surround. To evaluate the optimality of the LGN editing of retinal spikes, we created artificial spike trains from the retinal ones by various deletion schemes. We found that single LGN cells transmitted less information than an optimal detector could. Frontiers Research Foundation 2009-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2762372/ /pubmed/19838326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009 Text en Copyright © 2009 Uglesich, Casti, Hayot and Kaplan. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Uglesich, Robert Casti, Alex Hayot, Fernand Kaplan, Ehud Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title | Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title_full | Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title_fullStr | Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title_short | Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus |
title_sort | stimulus size dependence of information transfer from retina to thalamus |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uglesichrobert stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus AT castialex stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus AT hayotfernand stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus AT kaplanehud stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus |