Cargando…

Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus

Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uglesich, Robert, Casti, Alex, Hayot, Fernand, Kaplan, Ehud
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009
_version_ 1782172917203730432
author Uglesich, Robert
Casti, Alex
Hayot, Fernand
Kaplan, Ehud
author_facet Uglesich, Robert
Casti, Alex
Hayot, Fernand
Kaplan, Ehud
author_sort Uglesich, Robert
collection PubMed
description Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley, 1984). Recent studies, which used stimuli restricted to the receptive field (RF) center, show that despite the great loss of spikes, more than half of the information carried by the RGC discharge is typically preserved in the LGN discharge (Sincich et al., 2009), suggesting that the retinal spikes that are deleted by the LGN carry less information than those that are transmitted to the cortex. To determine how LGN relay neurons decide which retinal spikes to respond to, we recorded extracellularly from the cat LGN relay cell spikes together with the slow synaptic (‘S’) potentials that signal the firing of retinal spikes. We investigated the influence of the inhibitory surround of the LGN RF by stimulating the eyes with spots of various sizes, the largest of which covered the center and surround of the LGN relay cell's RF. We found that for stimuli that activated mostly the RF center, each LGN spike delivered more information than the retinal spike, but this difference was reduced as stimulus size increased to cover the RF surround. To evaluate the optimality of the LGN editing of retinal spikes, we created artificial spike trains from the retinal ones by various deletion schemes. We found that single LGN cells transmitted less information than an optimal detector could.
format Text
id pubmed-2762372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27623722009-10-16 Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus Uglesich, Robert Casti, Alex Hayot, Fernand Kaplan, Ehud Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Relay cells in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are driven primarily by single retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, an LGN cell responds typically to less than half of the spikes it receives from the RGC that drives it, and without retinal drive the LGN is silent (Kaplan and Shapley, 1984). Recent studies, which used stimuli restricted to the receptive field (RF) center, show that despite the great loss of spikes, more than half of the information carried by the RGC discharge is typically preserved in the LGN discharge (Sincich et al., 2009), suggesting that the retinal spikes that are deleted by the LGN carry less information than those that are transmitted to the cortex. To determine how LGN relay neurons decide which retinal spikes to respond to, we recorded extracellularly from the cat LGN relay cell spikes together with the slow synaptic (‘S’) potentials that signal the firing of retinal spikes. We investigated the influence of the inhibitory surround of the LGN RF by stimulating the eyes with spots of various sizes, the largest of which covered the center and surround of the LGN relay cell's RF. We found that for stimuli that activated mostly the RF center, each LGN spike delivered more information than the retinal spike, but this difference was reduced as stimulus size increased to cover the RF surround. To evaluate the optimality of the LGN editing of retinal spikes, we created artificial spike trains from the retinal ones by various deletion schemes. We found that single LGN cells transmitted less information than an optimal detector could. Frontiers Research Foundation 2009-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2762372/ /pubmed/19838326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009 Text en Copyright © 2009 Uglesich, Casti, Hayot and Kaplan. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Uglesich, Robert
Casti, Alex
Hayot, Fernand
Kaplan, Ehud
Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title_full Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title_fullStr Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title_full_unstemmed Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title_short Stimulus Size Dependence of Information Transfer from Retina to Thalamus
title_sort stimulus size dependence of information transfer from retina to thalamus
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.010.2009
work_keys_str_mv AT uglesichrobert stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus
AT castialex stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus
AT hayotfernand stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus
AT kaplanehud stimulussizedependenceofinformationtransferfromretinatothalamus