Cargando…
Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful?
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of vaginally implanted polypropylene meshes in the treatment of prolapse is becoming increasingly popular. We set out to detect how often bacterial colonisation of the mesh occurs and if the intraoperative sterility procedures that are applied matter. METHODS: In...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19727538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0951-5 |
_version_ | 1782172934853361664 |
---|---|
author | Vollebregt, Astrid Troelstra, Annet van der Vaart, C. Huub |
author_facet | Vollebregt, Astrid Troelstra, Annet van der Vaart, C. Huub |
author_sort | Vollebregt, Astrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of vaginally implanted polypropylene meshes in the treatment of prolapse is becoming increasingly popular. We set out to detect how often bacterial colonisation of the mesh occurs and if the intraoperative sterility procedures that are applied matter. METHODS: In 64 consecutive women, bacterial colonisation was compared between two intraoperative sterility procedures. Culture swabs of the core mesh were taken during surgery, and the mesh arms removed at the end of surgery were cultured separately. RESULTS: Sixty-seven implants were cultured. In 56 (83.6%) implants, a positive culture with vaginal bacteria was found with very low bacterial density (<10(3) colony-forming units). No significant differences in bacterial species, density, clinical infection and erosion (two anterior and one posterior) were found between the two intraoperative sterility methods. CONCLUSIONS: Colonisation of vaginally implanted mesh occurs frequently but in low bacterial densities, irrespective of the intraoperative sterility procedure used. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2762530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27625302009-10-21 Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? Vollebregt, Astrid Troelstra, Annet van der Vaart, C. Huub Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of vaginally implanted polypropylene meshes in the treatment of prolapse is becoming increasingly popular. We set out to detect how often bacterial colonisation of the mesh occurs and if the intraoperative sterility procedures that are applied matter. METHODS: In 64 consecutive women, bacterial colonisation was compared between two intraoperative sterility procedures. Culture swabs of the core mesh were taken during surgery, and the mesh arms removed at the end of surgery were cultured separately. RESULTS: Sixty-seven implants were cultured. In 56 (83.6%) implants, a positive culture with vaginal bacteria was found with very low bacterial density (<10(3) colony-forming units). No significant differences in bacterial species, density, clinical infection and erosion (two anterior and one posterior) were found between the two intraoperative sterility methods. CONCLUSIONS: Colonisation of vaginally implanted mesh occurs frequently but in low bacterial densities, irrespective of the intraoperative sterility procedure used. Springer-Verlag 2009-09-02 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2762530/ /pubmed/19727538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0951-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vollebregt, Astrid Troelstra, Annet van der Vaart, C. Huub Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title | Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title_full | Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title_fullStr | Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title_short | Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
title_sort | bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19727538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0951-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vollebregtastrid bacterialcolonisationofcollagencoatedpolypropylenevaginalmeshareadditionalintraoperativesterilityproceduresuseful AT troelstraannet bacterialcolonisationofcollagencoatedpolypropylenevaginalmeshareadditionalintraoperativesterilityproceduresuseful AT vandervaartchuub bacterialcolonisationofcollagencoatedpolypropylenevaginalmeshareadditionalintraoperativesterilityproceduresuseful |