Cargando…

Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool

BACKGROUND: Inpatient discharge instructions are a mandatory requirement of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. The instructions include all the information relevant to post-discharge patient care. Prior studies show that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeoneui, Nakamura, Carlos, Zeng-Treitler, Qing
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19275981
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1129
_version_ 1782172951476436992
author Kim, Hyeoneui
Nakamura, Carlos
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
author_facet Kim, Hyeoneui
Nakamura, Carlos
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
author_sort Kim, Hyeoneui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inpatient discharge instructions are a mandatory requirement of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. The instructions include all the information relevant to post-discharge patient care. Prior studies show that patients often cannot fully understand or remember all the instructions. To address this issue, we have previously conducted a pilot study in which pictographs were created through a participatory design process to facilitate the comprehension and recall of discharge instructions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to verify the individual effectiveness of pictographs created through a participatory design process. METHODS: In this study, we included 20 pictographs developed by our group and 20 pictographs developed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as a reference baseline for pictographic recognition. To assess whether the participants could recognize the meaning of the pictographs, we designed an asymmetrical pictograph–text label-linking test. Data collection lasted for 7 days after the email invitation. A total of 44 people accessed the survey site. We excluded 7 participants who completed less than 50% of the survey. A total of 719 answers from 37 participants were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the participants recognized the pictographs developed in-house significantly better than those included in the study as a baseline (P< .001). This trend was true regardless of the participant’s gender, age, and education level. The results also revealed that there is a large variance in the quality of the pictographs developed using the same design process—the recognition rate ranged from below 50% to above 90%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the majority of the pictographs developed in a participatory design process involving a small number of nurses and consumers were recognizable by a larger number of consumers. The variance in recognition rates suggests that pictographs should be assessed individually before being evaluated within the context of an application.
format Text
id pubmed-2762769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27627692009-10-16 Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool Kim, Hyeoneui Nakamura, Carlos Zeng-Treitler, Qing J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Inpatient discharge instructions are a mandatory requirement of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. The instructions include all the information relevant to post-discharge patient care. Prior studies show that patients often cannot fully understand or remember all the instructions. To address this issue, we have previously conducted a pilot study in which pictographs were created through a participatory design process to facilitate the comprehension and recall of discharge instructions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to verify the individual effectiveness of pictographs created through a participatory design process. METHODS: In this study, we included 20 pictographs developed by our group and 20 pictographs developed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as a reference baseline for pictographic recognition. To assess whether the participants could recognize the meaning of the pictographs, we designed an asymmetrical pictograph–text label-linking test. Data collection lasted for 7 days after the email invitation. A total of 44 people accessed the survey site. We excluded 7 participants who completed less than 50% of the survey. A total of 719 answers from 37 participants were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the participants recognized the pictographs developed in-house significantly better than those included in the study as a baseline (P< .001). This trend was true regardless of the participant’s gender, age, and education level. The results also revealed that there is a large variance in the quality of the pictographs developed using the same design process—the recognition rate ranged from below 50% to above 90%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the majority of the pictographs developed in a participatory design process involving a small number of nurses and consumers were recognizable by a larger number of consumers. The variance in recognition rates suggests that pictographs should be assessed individually before being evaluated within the context of an application. Gunther Eysenbach 2009-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2762769/ /pubmed/19275981 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1129 Text en © Hyeoneui Kim, Carlos Nakamura, Qing Zeng-Treitler. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.02.2009.   http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kim, Hyeoneui
Nakamura, Carlos
Zeng-Treitler, Qing
Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title_full Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title_fullStr Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title_short Assessment of Pictographs Developed Through a Participatory Design Process Using an Online Survey Tool
title_sort assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19275981
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1129
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeoneui assessmentofpictographsdevelopedthroughaparticipatorydesignprocessusinganonlinesurveytool
AT nakamuracarlos assessmentofpictographsdevelopedthroughaparticipatorydesignprocessusinganonlinesurveytool
AT zengtreitlerqing assessmentofpictographsdevelopedthroughaparticipatorydesignprocessusinganonlinesurveytool