Cargando…

A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraindividual visual acuity, wavefront errors and modulation transfer functions in patients implanted with two diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. METHODS: This prospective study examined 40 eyes of 20 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues, Netto, Marcelo Vieira, Barreto, Jackson, de Abreu Fiuza Gomes, Beatriz, Schaefer, Arthur, Kara-Junior, Newton
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2763069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19841701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009001000004
_version_ 1782172978480414720
author de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues
Netto, Marcelo Vieira
Barreto, Jackson
de Abreu Fiuza Gomes, Beatriz
Schaefer, Arthur
Kara-Junior, Newton
author_facet de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues
Netto, Marcelo Vieira
Barreto, Jackson
de Abreu Fiuza Gomes, Beatriz
Schaefer, Arthur
Kara-Junior, Newton
author_sort de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate intraindividual visual acuity, wavefront errors and modulation transfer functions in patients implanted with two diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. METHODS: This prospective study examined 40 eyes of 20 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a spherical multifocal ReSTOR intraocular lens in one eye and an aspheric Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in the other eye. The main outcome measures, over a 3-month follow-up period, were the uncorrected photopic distance and near visual acuity and the defocus curve. The visual acuity was converted to logMAR for statistical analysis and is presented in decimal scale. The wavefront error and modulation transfer function were also evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: At the 3-month postoperative visit, the mean photopic distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.74 ± 0.20 in the ReSTOR group and 0.76 ± 0.22 in the Tecnis group (p=0.286). The mean near UCVA was 0.96 ± 0.10 in the ReSTOR group and 0.93 ± 0.14 in the Tecnis group (p=0.963). The binocular defocus curve showed measurements between the peaks better than 0.2 logMAR. The total aberration, higher-order aberration and coma aberration were not significantly different between the groups. The spherical aberration was significantly lower in the Tecnis group than in the ReSTOR group. (p=0.004). Both groups performed similarly for the modulation transfer function. CONCLUSION: The ReSTOR SN60D3 and Tecnis ZM 900 intraocular lenses provided similar photopic visual acuity at distance and near. The diffractive intraocular lenses studied provided a low value of coma and spherical aberrations, with the Tecnis intraocular lens having a statistically lower spherical aberration compared to the ReSTOR intraocular lens. In the 5 mm pupil diameter analyses, both intraocular lens groups showed similar modulation transfer functions.
format Text
id pubmed-2763069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27630692009-10-19 A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues Netto, Marcelo Vieira Barreto, Jackson de Abreu Fiuza Gomes, Beatriz Schaefer, Arthur Kara-Junior, Newton Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Sciences PURPOSE: To evaluate intraindividual visual acuity, wavefront errors and modulation transfer functions in patients implanted with two diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. METHODS: This prospective study examined 40 eyes of 20 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a spherical multifocal ReSTOR intraocular lens in one eye and an aspheric Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in the other eye. The main outcome measures, over a 3-month follow-up period, were the uncorrected photopic distance and near visual acuity and the defocus curve. The visual acuity was converted to logMAR for statistical analysis and is presented in decimal scale. The wavefront error and modulation transfer function were also evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: At the 3-month postoperative visit, the mean photopic distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.74 ± 0.20 in the ReSTOR group and 0.76 ± 0.22 in the Tecnis group (p=0.286). The mean near UCVA was 0.96 ± 0.10 in the ReSTOR group and 0.93 ± 0.14 in the Tecnis group (p=0.963). The binocular defocus curve showed measurements between the peaks better than 0.2 logMAR. The total aberration, higher-order aberration and coma aberration were not significantly different between the groups. The spherical aberration was significantly lower in the Tecnis group than in the ReSTOR group. (p=0.004). Both groups performed similarly for the modulation transfer function. CONCLUSION: The ReSTOR SN60D3 and Tecnis ZM 900 intraocular lenses provided similar photopic visual acuity at distance and near. The diffractive intraocular lenses studied provided a low value of coma and spherical aberrations, with the Tecnis intraocular lens having a statistically lower spherical aberration compared to the ReSTOR intraocular lens. In the 5 mm pupil diameter analyses, both intraocular lens groups showed similar modulation transfer functions. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2763069/ /pubmed/19841701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009001000004 Text en Copyright © 2009 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
spellingShingle Clinical Sciences
de Santhiago, Marcony Rodrigues
Netto, Marcelo Vieira
Barreto, Jackson
de Abreu Fiuza Gomes, Beatriz
Schaefer, Arthur
Kara-Junior, Newton
A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title_full A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title_fullStr A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title_full_unstemmed A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title_short A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Apodized Diffrative and Full Diffrative Lenses: Wavefront Analysis and Distance and Near Uncorrected Visual Acuity
title_sort contralateral eye study comparing apodized diffrative and full diffrative lenses: wavefront analysis and distance and near uncorrected visual acuity
topic Clinical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2763069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19841701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009001000004
work_keys_str_mv AT desanthiagomarconyrodrigues acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT nettomarcelovieira acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT barretojackson acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT deabreufiuzagomesbeatriz acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT schaeferarthur acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT karajuniornewton acontralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT desanthiagomarconyrodrigues contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT nettomarcelovieira contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT barretojackson contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT deabreufiuzagomesbeatriz contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT schaeferarthur contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity
AT karajuniornewton contralateraleyestudycomparingapodizeddiffrativeandfulldiffrativelenseswavefrontanalysisanddistanceandnearuncorrectedvisualacuity