Cargando…
Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling
INTRODUCTION: Impulsivity is a central feature of drug addiction and may arise as a result of impaired inhibitory control. The extent to which inhibitory deficits arise as a consequence of drug exposure or relate to pre-existing addiction vulnerability is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2764851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19727677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1645-x |
_version_ | 1782173128738209792 |
---|---|
author | Lawrence, Andrew J. Luty, Jason Bogdan, Nadine A. Sahakian, Barbara J. Clark, Luke |
author_facet | Lawrence, Andrew J. Luty, Jason Bogdan, Nadine A. Sahakian, Barbara J. Clark, Luke |
author_sort | Lawrence, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Impulsivity is a central feature of drug addiction and may arise as a result of impaired inhibitory control. The extent to which inhibitory deficits arise as a consequence of drug exposure or relate to pre-existing addiction vulnerability is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared measures of impulsivity in outpatients with alcohol dependence (n = 23) and problem gambling (n = 21), a putative behavioural addiction where direct effects of drug exposure may be minimal. Healthy controls (n = 27) were also tested, in a cross-sectional design. Subjects completed the stop-signal test as a neurocognitive probe of response inhibition, alongside self-report ratings of impulsivity, adult ADHD and OCD. RESULTS: On the stop-signal test, Go reaction time and stop-signal reaction time were significantly slower in the alcohol-dependent group, compared with healthy controls. Healthy controls slowed their responding after successful and failed stop trials. Slowing after failed stop trials was significantly attenuated in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Go reaction time and post-error slowing were correlated with chronicity and severity, respectively, in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Problem gamblers did not differ significantly from controls on the stop-signal test, despite trait elevations in impulsivity ratings. CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control is impaired in alcohol dependence but occurs in the context of psychomotor slowing. In addition, alcohol-dependent individuals failed to show behavioral adjustment following failed stops. These deficits may represent direct effects of chronic alcohol administration on fronto-striatal circuitry. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2764851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27648512009-10-23 Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling Lawrence, Andrew J. Luty, Jason Bogdan, Nadine A. Sahakian, Barbara J. Clark, Luke Psychopharmacology (Berl) Original Investigation INTRODUCTION: Impulsivity is a central feature of drug addiction and may arise as a result of impaired inhibitory control. The extent to which inhibitory deficits arise as a consequence of drug exposure or relate to pre-existing addiction vulnerability is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared measures of impulsivity in outpatients with alcohol dependence (n = 23) and problem gambling (n = 21), a putative behavioural addiction where direct effects of drug exposure may be minimal. Healthy controls (n = 27) were also tested, in a cross-sectional design. Subjects completed the stop-signal test as a neurocognitive probe of response inhibition, alongside self-report ratings of impulsivity, adult ADHD and OCD. RESULTS: On the stop-signal test, Go reaction time and stop-signal reaction time were significantly slower in the alcohol-dependent group, compared with healthy controls. Healthy controls slowed their responding after successful and failed stop trials. Slowing after failed stop trials was significantly attenuated in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Go reaction time and post-error slowing were correlated with chronicity and severity, respectively, in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Problem gamblers did not differ significantly from controls on the stop-signal test, despite trait elevations in impulsivity ratings. CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control is impaired in alcohol dependence but occurs in the context of psychomotor slowing. In addition, alcohol-dependent individuals failed to show behavioral adjustment following failed stops. These deficits may represent direct effects of chronic alcohol administration on fronto-striatal circuitry. Springer-Verlag 2009-09-03 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2764851/ /pubmed/19727677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1645-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Lawrence, Andrew J. Luty, Jason Bogdan, Nadine A. Sahakian, Barbara J. Clark, Luke Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title | Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title_full | Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title_fullStr | Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title_full_unstemmed | Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title_short | Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
title_sort | impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2764851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19727677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1645-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawrenceandrewj impulsivityandresponseinhibitioninalcoholdependenceandproblemgambling AT lutyjason impulsivityandresponseinhibitioninalcoholdependenceandproblemgambling AT bogdannadinea impulsivityandresponseinhibitioninalcoholdependenceandproblemgambling AT sahakianbarbaraj impulsivityandresponseinhibitioninalcoholdependenceandproblemgambling AT clarkluke impulsivityandresponseinhibitioninalcoholdependenceandproblemgambling |