Cargando…

Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice

BACKGROUND: Quality is on the agenda of European general practice (GP). European researchers have, in collaboration, developed tools to assess quality of GPs. In this feasibility study, we tested the European Practice Assessment (EPA) in a one-off project in Belgium, where general practice has a low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Remmen, Roy, Seuntjens, Luc, Paulus, Dominique, Pestiaux, Dominique, Knops, Klaus, Bruel, Ann Van den
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-183
_version_ 1782173148575170560
author Remmen, Roy
Seuntjens, Luc
Paulus, Dominique
Pestiaux, Dominique
Knops, Klaus
Bruel, Ann Van den
author_facet Remmen, Roy
Seuntjens, Luc
Paulus, Dominique
Pestiaux, Dominique
Knops, Klaus
Bruel, Ann Van den
author_sort Remmen, Roy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality is on the agenda of European general practice (GP). European researchers have, in collaboration, developed tools to assess quality of GPs. In this feasibility study, we tested the European Practice Assessment (EPA) in a one-off project in Belgium, where general practice has a low level of GP organisation. METHODS: A framework for feasibility analysis included describing the recruiting of participants, a brief telephone study survey among non-responders, organisational and logistic problems. Using field notes and focus groups, we studied the participants' opinions. RESULTS: In this study, only 36 of 1000 invited practices agreed to participate. Co-ordination, administrative work, practice visits and organisational problems required several days per practice. The researchers further encountered technical problems, for instance when entering the data and uploading to the web-based server. In subsequent qualitative analysis using two focus groups, most participant GPs expressed a positive feeling after the EPA procedure. In the short period of follow-up, only a few GPs reported improvements after the visit. The participant GPs suggested that follow-up and coaching would probably facilitate the implementation of changes. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study shows that prior interest in EPA is low in the GP community. We encountered a number of logistic and organisational problems. It proved attractive to participants, but it can be augmented by coaching of participants in more than a one-off project to identify and achieve targets for quality improvement. In the absence of commitment of the government, a network of universities and one scientific organisation will offer EPA as a service to training practices.
format Text
id pubmed-2765434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27654342009-10-22 Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice Remmen, Roy Seuntjens, Luc Paulus, Dominique Pestiaux, Dominique Knops, Klaus Bruel, Ann Van den BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality is on the agenda of European general practice (GP). European researchers have, in collaboration, developed tools to assess quality of GPs. In this feasibility study, we tested the European Practice Assessment (EPA) in a one-off project in Belgium, where general practice has a low level of GP organisation. METHODS: A framework for feasibility analysis included describing the recruiting of participants, a brief telephone study survey among non-responders, organisational and logistic problems. Using field notes and focus groups, we studied the participants' opinions. RESULTS: In this study, only 36 of 1000 invited practices agreed to participate. Co-ordination, administrative work, practice visits and organisational problems required several days per practice. The researchers further encountered technical problems, for instance when entering the data and uploading to the web-based server. In subsequent qualitative analysis using two focus groups, most participant GPs expressed a positive feeling after the EPA procedure. In the short period of follow-up, only a few GPs reported improvements after the visit. The participant GPs suggested that follow-up and coaching would probably facilitate the implementation of changes. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study shows that prior interest in EPA is low in the GP community. We encountered a number of logistic and organisational problems. It proved attractive to participants, but it can be augmented by coaching of participants in more than a one-off project to identify and achieve targets for quality improvement. In the absence of commitment of the government, a network of universities and one scientific organisation will offer EPA as a service to training practices. BioMed Central 2009-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2765434/ /pubmed/19818153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-183 Text en Copyright © 2009 Remmen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Remmen, Roy
Seuntjens, Luc
Paulus, Dominique
Pestiaux, Dominique
Knops, Klaus
Bruel, Ann Van den
Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title_full Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title_fullStr Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title_full_unstemmed Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title_short Can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of European practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
title_sort can we import quality tools? a feasibility study of european practice assessment in a country with less organised general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-183
work_keys_str_mv AT remmenroy canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice
AT seuntjensluc canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice
AT paulusdominique canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice
AT pestiauxdominique canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice
AT knopsklaus canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice
AT bruelannvanden canweimportqualitytoolsafeasibilitystudyofeuropeanpracticeassessmentinacountrywithlessorganisedgeneralpractice