Cargando…

Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration

BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Youlan L, Fokkema, Marieke L, Kampinga, Marthe A, de Smet, Bart JGL, Tan, Eng S, van den Heuvel, Ad FM, Zijlstra, Felix
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90
_version_ 1782173176424300544
author Gu, Youlan L
Fokkema, Marieke L
Kampinga, Marthe A
de Smet, Bart JGL
Tan, Eng S
van den Heuvel, Ad FM
Zijlstra, Felix
author_facet Gu, Youlan L
Fokkema, Marieke L
Kampinga, Marthe A
de Smet, Bart JGL
Tan, Eng S
van den Heuvel, Ad FM
Zijlstra, Felix
author_sort Gu, Youlan L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is superior to conventional intravenous administration. This study has been designed to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is more effective than intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. METHODS/DESIGN: The Comparison of IntraCoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 530 patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are randomly assigned to either an intracoronary or intravenous bolus of weight-adjusted abciximab. The primary end point is the incidence of >70% ST-segment elevation resolution. Secondary end points consist of post-procedural residual ST-segment deviation, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, in-hospital bleeding, and clinical outcome at 30 days and 1 year. DISCUSSION: The CICERO trial is the first clinical trial to date to verify the effect of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927615
format Text
id pubmed-2765937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27659372009-10-23 Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration Gu, Youlan L Fokkema, Marieke L Kampinga, Marthe A de Smet, Bart JGL Tan, Eng S van den Heuvel, Ad FM Zijlstra, Felix Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is superior to conventional intravenous administration. This study has been designed to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is more effective than intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. METHODS/DESIGN: The Comparison of IntraCoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 530 patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are randomly assigned to either an intracoronary or intravenous bolus of weight-adjusted abciximab. The primary end point is the incidence of >70% ST-segment elevation resolution. Secondary end points consist of post-procedural residual ST-segment deviation, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, in-hospital bleeding, and clinical outcome at 30 days and 1 year. DISCUSSION: The CICERO trial is the first clinical trial to date to verify the effect of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927615 BioMed Central 2009-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2765937/ /pubmed/19785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gu, Youlan L
Fokkema, Marieke L
Kampinga, Marthe A
de Smet, Bart JGL
Tan, Eng S
van den Heuvel, Ad FM
Zijlstra, Felix
Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title_full Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title_fullStr Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title_full_unstemmed Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title_short Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
title_sort intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the cicero trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90
work_keys_str_mv AT guyoulanl intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT fokkemamariekel intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT kampingamarthea intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT desmetbartjgl intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT tanengs intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT vandenheuveladfm intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration
AT zijlstrafelix intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration