Cargando…
Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration
BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90 |
_version_ | 1782173176424300544 |
---|---|
author | Gu, Youlan L Fokkema, Marieke L Kampinga, Marthe A de Smet, Bart JGL Tan, Eng S van den Heuvel, Ad FM Zijlstra, Felix |
author_facet | Gu, Youlan L Fokkema, Marieke L Kampinga, Marthe A de Smet, Bart JGL Tan, Eng S van den Heuvel, Ad FM Zijlstra, Felix |
author_sort | Gu, Youlan L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is superior to conventional intravenous administration. This study has been designed to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is more effective than intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. METHODS/DESIGN: The Comparison of IntraCoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 530 patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are randomly assigned to either an intracoronary or intravenous bolus of weight-adjusted abciximab. The primary end point is the incidence of >70% ST-segment elevation resolution. Secondary end points consist of post-procedural residual ST-segment deviation, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, in-hospital bleeding, and clinical outcome at 30 days and 1 year. DISCUSSION: The CICERO trial is the first clinical trial to date to verify the effect of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927615 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2765937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27659372009-10-23 Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration Gu, Youlan L Fokkema, Marieke L Kampinga, Marthe A de Smet, Bart JGL Tan, Eng S van den Heuvel, Ad FM Zijlstra, Felix Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is superior to conventional intravenous administration. This study has been designed to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is more effective than intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. METHODS/DESIGN: The Comparison of IntraCoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 530 patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are randomly assigned to either an intracoronary or intravenous bolus of weight-adjusted abciximab. The primary end point is the incidence of >70% ST-segment elevation resolution. Secondary end points consist of post-procedural residual ST-segment deviation, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, in-hospital bleeding, and clinical outcome at 30 days and 1 year. DISCUSSION: The CICERO trial is the first clinical trial to date to verify the effect of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927615 BioMed Central 2009-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2765937/ /pubmed/19785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Gu, Youlan L Fokkema, Marieke L Kampinga, Marthe A de Smet, Bart JGL Tan, Eng S van den Heuvel, Ad FM Zijlstra, Felix Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title | Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title_full | Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title_fullStr | Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title_full_unstemmed | Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title_short | Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
title_sort | intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the cicero trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-90 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guyoulanl intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT fokkemamariekel intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT kampingamarthea intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT desmetbartjgl intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT tanengs intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT vandenheuveladfm intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration AT zijlstrafelix intracoronaryversusintravenousabciximabinstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionrationaleanddesignofthecicerotrialinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwiththrombusaspiration |