Cargando…
A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We de...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471 |
_version_ | 1782173188077125632 |
---|---|
author | Ammar, Ron Smith, Andrew M Heisler, Lawrence E Giaever, Guri Nislow, Corey |
author_facet | Ammar, Ron Smith, Andrew M Heisler, Lawrence E Giaever, Guri Nislow, Corey |
author_sort | Ammar, Ron |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We demonstrate that barcode microarrays with smaller features are equally capable of detecting variation in DNA barcode intensity when compared to larger feature sizes within a specific microarray platform. The barcodes used in this study are the well-characterized set derived from the Yeast KnockOut (YKO) collection used for screens of pooled yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) deletion mutants. We treated these pools with the glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin as a test compound. Three generations of barcode microarrays at 30, 8 and 5 μm features sizes independently identified the primary target of tunicamycin to be ALG7. CONCLUSION: We show that the data obtained with 5 μm feature size is of comparable quality to the 30 μm size and propose that further shrinking of features could yield barcode microarrays with equal or greater resolving power and, more importantly, higher density. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2765990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27659902009-10-23 A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size Ammar, Ron Smith, Andrew M Heisler, Lawrence E Giaever, Guri Nislow, Corey BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We demonstrate that barcode microarrays with smaller features are equally capable of detecting variation in DNA barcode intensity when compared to larger feature sizes within a specific microarray platform. The barcodes used in this study are the well-characterized set derived from the Yeast KnockOut (YKO) collection used for screens of pooled yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) deletion mutants. We treated these pools with the glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin as a test compound. Three generations of barcode microarrays at 30, 8 and 5 μm features sizes independently identified the primary target of tunicamycin to be ALG7. CONCLUSION: We show that the data obtained with 5 μm feature size is of comparable quality to the 30 μm size and propose that further shrinking of features could yield barcode microarrays with equal or greater resolving power and, more importantly, higher density. BioMed Central 2009-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2765990/ /pubmed/19825181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ammar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Ammar, Ron Smith, Andrew M Heisler, Lawrence E Giaever, Guri Nislow, Corey A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title | A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title_full | A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title_short | A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size |
title_sort | comparative analysis of dna barcode microarray feature size |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ammarron acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT smithandrewm acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT heislerlawrencee acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT giaeverguri acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT nislowcorey acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT ammarron comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT smithandrewm comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT heislerlawrencee comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT giaeverguri comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize AT nislowcorey comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize |