Cargando…

A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size

BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ammar, Ron, Smith, Andrew M, Heisler, Lawrence E, Giaever, Guri, Nislow, Corey
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471
_version_ 1782173188077125632
author Ammar, Ron
Smith, Andrew M
Heisler, Lawrence E
Giaever, Guri
Nislow, Corey
author_facet Ammar, Ron
Smith, Andrew M
Heisler, Lawrence E
Giaever, Guri
Nislow, Corey
author_sort Ammar, Ron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We demonstrate that barcode microarrays with smaller features are equally capable of detecting variation in DNA barcode intensity when compared to larger feature sizes within a specific microarray platform. The barcodes used in this study are the well-characterized set derived from the Yeast KnockOut (YKO) collection used for screens of pooled yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) deletion mutants. We treated these pools with the glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin as a test compound. Three generations of barcode microarrays at 30, 8 and 5 μm features sizes independently identified the primary target of tunicamycin to be ALG7. CONCLUSION: We show that the data obtained with 5 μm feature size is of comparable quality to the 30 μm size and propose that further shrinking of features could yield barcode microarrays with equal or greater resolving power and, more importantly, higher density.
format Text
id pubmed-2765990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27659902009-10-23 A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size Ammar, Ron Smith, Andrew M Heisler, Lawrence E Giaever, Guri Nislow, Corey BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Microarrays are an invaluable tool in many modern genomic studies. It is generally perceived that decreasing the size of microarray features leads to arrays with higher resolution (due to greater feature density), but this increase in resolution can compromise sensitivity. RESULTS: We demonstrate that barcode microarrays with smaller features are equally capable of detecting variation in DNA barcode intensity when compared to larger feature sizes within a specific microarray platform. The barcodes used in this study are the well-characterized set derived from the Yeast KnockOut (YKO) collection used for screens of pooled yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) deletion mutants. We treated these pools with the glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin as a test compound. Three generations of barcode microarrays at 30, 8 and 5 μm features sizes independently identified the primary target of tunicamycin to be ALG7. CONCLUSION: We show that the data obtained with 5 μm feature size is of comparable quality to the 30 μm size and propose that further shrinking of features could yield barcode microarrays with equal or greater resolving power and, more importantly, higher density. BioMed Central 2009-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2765990/ /pubmed/19825181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ammar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Ammar, Ron
Smith, Andrew M
Heisler, Lawrence E
Giaever, Guri
Nislow, Corey
A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title_full A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title_short A comparative analysis of DNA barcode microarray feature size
title_sort comparative analysis of dna barcode microarray feature size
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2765990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-471
work_keys_str_mv AT ammarron acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT smithandrewm acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT heislerlawrencee acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT giaeverguri acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT nislowcorey acomparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT ammarron comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT smithandrewm comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT heislerlawrencee comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT giaeverguri comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize
AT nislowcorey comparativeanalysisofdnabarcodemicroarrayfeaturesize