Cargando…

Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group

BACKGROUND: Although antimicrobial resistance and persistence of resistant bacteria in humans and animals are major health concerns worldwide, the impact of antimicrobial resistance on bacterial intestinal colonization in healthy domestic animals has only been rarely studied. We carried out a retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schierack, Peter, Kadlec, Kristina, Guenther, Sebastian, Filter, Matthias, Schwarz, Stefan, Ewers, Christa, Wieler, Lothar H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19814790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-1-18
_version_ 1782173216342540288
author Schierack, Peter
Kadlec, Kristina
Guenther, Sebastian
Filter, Matthias
Schwarz, Stefan
Ewers, Christa
Wieler, Lothar H
author_facet Schierack, Peter
Kadlec, Kristina
Guenther, Sebastian
Filter, Matthias
Schwarz, Stefan
Ewers, Christa
Wieler, Lothar H
author_sort Schierack, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although antimicrobial resistance and persistence of resistant bacteria in humans and animals are major health concerns worldwide, the impact of antimicrobial resistance on bacterial intestinal colonization in healthy domestic animals has only been rarely studied. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility status and the presence of resistance genes in intestinal commensal E. coli clones from clinically healthy pigs from one production unit with particular focus on effects of pheno- and/or genotypic resistance on different nominal and numerical intestinal colonization parameters. In addition, we compared the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes with the occurrence of virulence associated genes typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. RESULTS: In general, up to 72.1% of all E. coli clones were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole or tetracycline with a variety of different resistance genes involved. There was no significant correlation between one of the nominal or numerical colonization parameters and the absence or presence of antimicrobial resistance properties or resistance genes. However, there were several statistically significant associations between the occurrence of single resistance genes and single virulence associated genes. CONCLUSION: The demonstrated resistance to the tested antibiotics might not play a dominant role for an intestinal colonization success in pigs in the absence of antimicrobial drugs, or cross-selection of other colonization factors e.g. virulence associated genes might compensate "the cost of antibiotic resistance". Nevertheless, resistant strains are not outcompeted by susceptible bacteria in the porcine intestine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local animal welfare committee of the "Landesamt für Arbeitsschutz, Gesundheitsschutz und technische Sicherheit" Berlin, Germany (No. G0037/02).
format Text
id pubmed-2766387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27663872009-10-24 Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group Schierack, Peter Kadlec, Kristina Guenther, Sebastian Filter, Matthias Schwarz, Stefan Ewers, Christa Wieler, Lothar H Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: Although antimicrobial resistance and persistence of resistant bacteria in humans and animals are major health concerns worldwide, the impact of antimicrobial resistance on bacterial intestinal colonization in healthy domestic animals has only been rarely studied. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility status and the presence of resistance genes in intestinal commensal E. coli clones from clinically healthy pigs from one production unit with particular focus on effects of pheno- and/or genotypic resistance on different nominal and numerical intestinal colonization parameters. In addition, we compared the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes with the occurrence of virulence associated genes typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. RESULTS: In general, up to 72.1% of all E. coli clones were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole or tetracycline with a variety of different resistance genes involved. There was no significant correlation between one of the nominal or numerical colonization parameters and the absence or presence of antimicrobial resistance properties or resistance genes. However, there were several statistically significant associations between the occurrence of single resistance genes and single virulence associated genes. CONCLUSION: The demonstrated resistance to the tested antibiotics might not play a dominant role for an intestinal colonization success in pigs in the absence of antimicrobial drugs, or cross-selection of other colonization factors e.g. virulence associated genes might compensate "the cost of antibiotic resistance". Nevertheless, resistant strains are not outcompeted by susceptible bacteria in the porcine intestine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local animal welfare committee of the "Landesamt für Arbeitsschutz, Gesundheitsschutz und technische Sicherheit" Berlin, Germany (No. G0037/02). BioMed Central 2009-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2766387/ /pubmed/19814790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-1-18 Text en Copyright © 2009 Schierack et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schierack, Peter
Kadlec, Kristina
Guenther, Sebastian
Filter, Matthias
Schwarz, Stefan
Ewers, Christa
Wieler, Lothar H
Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title_full Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title_short Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
title_sort antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal e. coli in a small piglet group
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19814790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-1-18
work_keys_str_mv AT schierackpeter antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT kadleckristina antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT guenthersebastian antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT filtermatthias antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT schwarzstefan antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT ewerschrista antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup
AT wielerlotharh antimicrobialresistancesdonotaffectcolonizationparametersofintestinalecoliinasmallpigletgroup