Cargando…

Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools

In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene, Moerman, Mieke, Martens, Jean-Pierre, Deuster, Dirk, Müller, Frank, Dejonckere, Philippe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19866529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7
_version_ 1782173225378119680
author Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene
Moerman, Mieke
Martens, Jean-Pierre
Deuster, Dirk
Müller, Frank
Dejonckere, Philippe
author_facet Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene
Moerman, Mieke
Martens, Jean-Pierre
Deuster, Dirk
Müller, Frank
Dejonckere, Philippe
author_sort Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene
collection PubMed
description In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 12 patients were analysed. The inter-rater and intra-rater consistency showed highly significant correlations for the IINFVo rating scale, with the exception of the parameter Noise. AMPEX reliably analyses vowels (correlation between PUVF (percentage of frames with unreliable F0/voicing 0.748), running speech (correlation between PVF (percentage of voiced frames)/voicing 0.699) and syllables. Correlations between IINFVo and AMPEX range from 0.608 to 0.818, except for noise. This study indicates that IINFVo and AMPEX could be robust and complementary assessment tools for the evaluation of AdSD. Both the tools provide us with the valuable information about voice quality, stability of F0 (fundamental frequency) and specific dimensions controlling the transitions between voiced and unvoiced segments.
format Text
id pubmed-2766499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27664992009-10-26 Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene Moerman, Mieke Martens, Jean-Pierre Deuster, Dirk Müller, Frank Dejonckere, Philippe Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 12 patients were analysed. The inter-rater and intra-rater consistency showed highly significant correlations for the IINFVo rating scale, with the exception of the parameter Noise. AMPEX reliably analyses vowels (correlation between PUVF (percentage of frames with unreliable F0/voicing 0.748), running speech (correlation between PVF (percentage of voiced frames)/voicing 0.699) and syllables. Correlations between IINFVo and AMPEX range from 0.608 to 0.818, except for noise. This study indicates that IINFVo and AMPEX could be robust and complementary assessment tools for the evaluation of AdSD. Both the tools provide us with the valuable information about voice quality, stability of F0 (fundamental frequency) and specific dimensions controlling the transitions between voiced and unvoiced segments. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-03 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2766499/ /pubmed/19866529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Laryngology
Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene
Moerman, Mieke
Martens, Jean-Pierre
Deuster, Dirk
Müller, Frank
Dejonckere, Philippe
Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title_full Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title_fullStr Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title_full_unstemmed Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title_short Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
title_sort spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19866529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7
work_keys_str_mv AT siemonsluhringdeniseirene spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools
AT moermanmieke spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools
AT martensjeanpierre spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools
AT deusterdirk spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools
AT mullerfrank spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools
AT dejonckerephilippe spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools