Cargando…
Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools
In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19866529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7 |
_version_ | 1782173225378119680 |
---|---|
author | Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene Moerman, Mieke Martens, Jean-Pierre Deuster, Dirk Müller, Frank Dejonckere, Philippe |
author_facet | Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene Moerman, Mieke Martens, Jean-Pierre Deuster, Dirk Müller, Frank Dejonckere, Philippe |
author_sort | Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 12 patients were analysed. The inter-rater and intra-rater consistency showed highly significant correlations for the IINFVo rating scale, with the exception of the parameter Noise. AMPEX reliably analyses vowels (correlation between PUVF (percentage of frames with unreliable F0/voicing 0.748), running speech (correlation between PVF (percentage of voiced frames)/voicing 0.699) and syllables. Correlations between IINFVo and AMPEX range from 0.608 to 0.818, except for noise. This study indicates that IINFVo and AMPEX could be robust and complementary assessment tools for the evaluation of AdSD. Both the tools provide us with the valuable information about voice quality, stability of F0 (fundamental frequency) and specific dimensions controlling the transitions between voiced and unvoiced segments. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2766499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27664992009-10-26 Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene Moerman, Mieke Martens, Jean-Pierre Deuster, Dirk Müller, Frank Dejonckere, Philippe Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology In this article, we investigate whether (1) the IINFVo (Impression, Intelligibility, Noise, Fluency and Voicing) perceptual rating scale and (2) the AMPEX (Auditory Model Based Pitch Extractor) acoustical analysis are suitable for evaluating adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD). Voice recordings of 12 patients were analysed. The inter-rater and intra-rater consistency showed highly significant correlations for the IINFVo rating scale, with the exception of the parameter Noise. AMPEX reliably analyses vowels (correlation between PUVF (percentage of frames with unreliable F0/voicing 0.748), running speech (correlation between PVF (percentage of voiced frames)/voicing 0.699) and syllables. Correlations between IINFVo and AMPEX range from 0.608 to 0.818, except for noise. This study indicates that IINFVo and AMPEX could be robust and complementary assessment tools for the evaluation of AdSD. Both the tools provide us with the valuable information about voice quality, stability of F0 (fundamental frequency) and specific dimensions controlling the transitions between voiced and unvoiced segments. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-03 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2766499/ /pubmed/19866529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Laryngology Siemons-Lühring, Denise Irene Moerman, Mieke Martens, Jean-Pierre Deuster, Dirk Müller, Frank Dejonckere, Philippe Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title | Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title_full | Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title_fullStr | Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title_short | Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
title_sort | spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools |
topic | Laryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19866529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0995-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siemonsluhringdeniseirene spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools AT moermanmieke spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools AT martensjeanpierre spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools AT deusterdirk spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools AT mullerfrank spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools AT dejonckerephilippe spasmodicdysphoniaperceptualandacousticanalysispresentingnewdiagnostictools |