Cargando…

When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?

Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding plat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinek, Igor E., Kehoe, Sean
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19859583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/852028
_version_ 1782173226569302016
author Martinek, Igor E.
Kehoe, Sean
author_facet Martinek, Igor E.
Kehoe, Sean
author_sort Martinek, Igor E.
collection PubMed
description Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding platinum-based chemotherapy. Many studies have shown that the volume of residual disease after initial surgical cytoreduction inversely correlates with survival. Thus, women with optimal debulking performed by a trained specialist have improved median survival. In this review, we will focus on the answers gleaned from clinical trials on primary and interval surgery, which prompts the question on the timing of surgery in respect to chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is secondary cytoreduction following primary debulking and is carried out in between the courses of chemotherapy. The major clinical trials and the latest systematic reviews seem unable to give any definitive guidance or recommendation for clinical practice. The choice of aggressive primary cytoreduction or upfront chemotherapy followed by second line surgical cytoreduction seems among others to have to be individualized according to tumour load, prediction of its resectability, and response to chemotherapy. The role of tumour biology must also be kept in mind. Finally, concrete answers are awaited on the timing of surgery from the ongoing prospective randomized control trials (CHORUS and EORTC 55971) though preliminary data from the latter have already been presented at major meetings (IGCS 2008; SGO 2009) and ignited strong debate.
format Text
id pubmed-2766504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27665042009-10-26 When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place? Martinek, Igor E. Kehoe, Sean J Oncol Review Article Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding platinum-based chemotherapy. Many studies have shown that the volume of residual disease after initial surgical cytoreduction inversely correlates with survival. Thus, women with optimal debulking performed by a trained specialist have improved median survival. In this review, we will focus on the answers gleaned from clinical trials on primary and interval surgery, which prompts the question on the timing of surgery in respect to chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is secondary cytoreduction following primary debulking and is carried out in between the courses of chemotherapy. The major clinical trials and the latest systematic reviews seem unable to give any definitive guidance or recommendation for clinical practice. The choice of aggressive primary cytoreduction or upfront chemotherapy followed by second line surgical cytoreduction seems among others to have to be individualized according to tumour load, prediction of its resectability, and response to chemotherapy. The role of tumour biology must also be kept in mind. Finally, concrete answers are awaited on the timing of surgery from the ongoing prospective randomized control trials (CHORUS and EORTC 55971) though preliminary data from the latter have already been presented at major meetings (IGCS 2008; SGO 2009) and ignited strong debate. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2009-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2766504/ /pubmed/19859583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/852028 Text en Copyright © 2010 I. E. Martinek and S. Kehoe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Martinek, Igor E.
Kehoe, Sean
When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title_full When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title_fullStr When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title_full_unstemmed When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title_short When Should Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Take Place?
title_sort when should surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer take place?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19859583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/852028
work_keys_str_mv AT martinekigore whenshouldsurgicalcytoreductioninadvancedovariancancertakeplace
AT kehoesean whenshouldsurgicalcytoreductioninadvancedovariancancertakeplace