Cargando…

The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee

BACKGROUND: To determine if tibial positioning affects the external rotation of the tibia in a dial test for posterolateral rotatory instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. METHODS: Between April 2007 and October 2007, 16 patients with a PCL tear and posterolateral rota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Young-Bok, Nam, Chang-Hyun, Jung, Ho-Joong, Lee, Yong-Seuk, Ko, Young-Bong
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19885057
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.68
_version_ 1782173240973590528
author Jung, Young-Bok
Nam, Chang-Hyun
Jung, Ho-Joong
Lee, Yong-Seuk
Ko, Young-Bong
author_facet Jung, Young-Bok
Nam, Chang-Hyun
Jung, Ho-Joong
Lee, Yong-Seuk
Ko, Young-Bong
author_sort Jung, Young-Bok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine if tibial positioning affects the external rotation of the tibia in a dial test for posterolateral rotatory instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. METHODS: Between April 2007 and October 2007, 16 patients with a PCL tear and posterolateral rotatory instability were diagnosed using a dial test. The thigh-foot angle was measured at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion with an external rotation stress applied to the tibia in 2 different positions (reduction and posterior subluxation). The measurements were performed twice by 2 orthopedic surgeons. RESULTS: In posterior subluxation, the mean side-to-side difference in the thigh-foot angle was 11.56 ± 3.01° at 30° of knee flexion and 11.88 ± 4.03° at 90° of knee flexion. In the sequential dial test performed with the tibia reduced, the mean side-to-side difference was 15.94 ± 4.17° (p < 0.05) at 30° of knee flexion and 16.88 ± 4.42° (p = 0.001) at 90° of knee flexion. The mean tibial external rotation was 5.31 ± 2.86° and 6.87 ± 3.59° higher in the reduced position than in the posterior subluxation at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: In the dial test, reducing the tibia with an anterior force increases the ability of an examiner to detect posterolateral rotary instability of the knee combined with PCL injuries.
format Text
id pubmed-2766754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27667542009-11-02 The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee Jung, Young-Bok Nam, Chang-Hyun Jung, Ho-Joong Lee, Yong-Seuk Ko, Young-Bong Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine if tibial positioning affects the external rotation of the tibia in a dial test for posterolateral rotatory instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. METHODS: Between April 2007 and October 2007, 16 patients with a PCL tear and posterolateral rotatory instability were diagnosed using a dial test. The thigh-foot angle was measured at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion with an external rotation stress applied to the tibia in 2 different positions (reduction and posterior subluxation). The measurements were performed twice by 2 orthopedic surgeons. RESULTS: In posterior subluxation, the mean side-to-side difference in the thigh-foot angle was 11.56 ± 3.01° at 30° of knee flexion and 11.88 ± 4.03° at 90° of knee flexion. In the sequential dial test performed with the tibia reduced, the mean side-to-side difference was 15.94 ± 4.17° (p < 0.05) at 30° of knee flexion and 16.88 ± 4.42° (p = 0.001) at 90° of knee flexion. The mean tibial external rotation was 5.31 ± 2.86° and 6.87 ± 3.59° higher in the reduced position than in the posterior subluxation at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: In the dial test, reducing the tibia with an anterior force increases the ability of an examiner to detect posterolateral rotary instability of the knee combined with PCL injuries. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2009-06 2009-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2766754/ /pubmed/19885057 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.68 Text en Copyright © 2009 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jung, Young-Bok
Nam, Chang-Hyun
Jung, Ho-Joong
Lee, Yong-Seuk
Ko, Young-Bong
The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title_full The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title_fullStr The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title_short The Influence of Tibial Positioning on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee
title_sort influence of tibial positioning on the diagnostic accuracy of combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2766754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19885057
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.68
work_keys_str_mv AT jungyoungbok theinfluenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT namchanghyun theinfluenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT junghojoong theinfluenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT leeyongseuk theinfluenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT koyoungbong theinfluenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT jungyoungbok influenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT namchanghyun influenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT junghojoong influenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT leeyongseuk influenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee
AT koyoungbong influenceoftibialpositioningonthediagnosticaccuracyofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentandposterolateralrotatoryinstabilityoftheknee