Cargando…

Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosmas, C, Mylonakis, N, Tsakonas, G, Vorgias, G, Karvounis, N, Tsavaris, N, Daladimos, T, Kalinoglou, N, Malamos, N, Akrivos, T, Karabelis, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19738606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605305
_version_ 1782173431668670464
author Kosmas, C
Mylonakis, N
Tsakonas, G
Vorgias, G
Karvounis, N
Tsavaris, N
Daladimos, T
Kalinoglou, N
Malamos, N
Akrivos, T
Karabelis, A
author_facet Kosmas, C
Mylonakis, N
Tsakonas, G
Vorgias, G
Karvounis, N
Tsavaris, N
Daladimos, T
Kalinoglou, N
Malamos, N
Akrivos, T
Karabelis, A
author_sort Kosmas, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0–2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m(−2) on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m(−2) on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m(−2) on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25–74) years; PS: 1 (0–2); histologies – squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3–76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7–39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5–49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7–50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7–92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2–34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3–36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2768083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27680832010-10-06 Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer Kosmas, C Mylonakis, N Tsakonas, G Vorgias, G Karvounis, N Tsavaris, N Daladimos, T Kalinoglou, N Malamos, N Akrivos, T Karabelis, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0–2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m(−2) on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m(−2) on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m(−2) on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25–74) years; PS: 1 (0–2); histologies – squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3–76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7–39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5–49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7–50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7–92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2–34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3–36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2009-10-06 2009-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2768083/ /pubmed/19738606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605305 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kosmas, C
Mylonakis, N
Tsakonas, G
Vorgias, G
Karvounis, N
Tsavaris, N
Daladimos, T
Kalinoglou, N
Malamos, N
Akrivos, T
Karabelis, A
Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title_full Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title_short Evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
title_sort evaluation of the paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (tip) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19738606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605305
work_keys_str_mv AT kosmasc evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT mylonakisn evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT tsakonasg evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT vorgiasg evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT karvounisn evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT tsavarisn evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT daladimost evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT kalinogloun evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT malamosn evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT akrivost evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer
AT karabelisa evaluationofthepaclitaxelifosfamidecisplatintipcombinationinrelapsedandormetastaticcervicalcancer