Cargando…

The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of physical therapy alone and in combination with calcitonin in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single blind, and randomized study, patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who were diagnosed by cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahin, Fusun, Yilmaz, Figen, Kotevoglu, Nurdan, Kuran, Banu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19881973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683
_version_ 1782173459966590976
author Sahin, Fusun
Yilmaz, Figen
Kotevoglu, Nurdan
Kuran, Banu
author_facet Sahin, Fusun
Yilmaz, Figen
Kotevoglu, Nurdan
Kuran, Banu
author_sort Sahin, Fusun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of physical therapy alone and in combination with calcitonin in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single blind, and randomized study, patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who were diagnosed by clinical findings and MRI and having NC were included. Patients were observed for 8 weeks and evaluated before and after treatment. Patients were randomized between the salmon calcitonin 200 U/day + physical therapy (n = 23) (Group 1) and paracetamol 1,500 mg/day + physical therapy (n = 22) (Group 2) treatment groups. Both groups received the same physical therapy (interferential current + hot pack + short wave diathermy) and exercise protocol. The association of various clinical and functional parameters was assessed statistically by using paired and unpaired t test, chi square test and McNemar's test. p < 0.05 indicated statistical significant. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients in Group 1 was 57.6 ± 11.2 and in Group 2 54.5 ± 10.6 years. Before treatment, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, body mass index, spinal axial diameter, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), spinal mobility, functional status and walking distance (p > 0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, both groups benefited significantly with respect to VAS, functional status and walking distance (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In 45 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who received 8 weeks of treatment, concomitant use of calcitonin with physical therapy and exercise did not have any benefical effect on the patient's pain, functional status, lumbar mobility and walking distance.
format Text
id pubmed-2768244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27682442009-10-31 The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Sahin, Fusun Yilmaz, Figen Kotevoglu, Nurdan Kuran, Banu Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of physical therapy alone and in combination with calcitonin in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single blind, and randomized study, patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who were diagnosed by clinical findings and MRI and having NC were included. Patients were observed for 8 weeks and evaluated before and after treatment. Patients were randomized between the salmon calcitonin 200 U/day + physical therapy (n = 23) (Group 1) and paracetamol 1,500 mg/day + physical therapy (n = 22) (Group 2) treatment groups. Both groups received the same physical therapy (interferential current + hot pack + short wave diathermy) and exercise protocol. The association of various clinical and functional parameters was assessed statistically by using paired and unpaired t test, chi square test and McNemar's test. p < 0.05 indicated statistical significant. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients in Group 1 was 57.6 ± 11.2 and in Group 2 54.5 ± 10.6 years. Before treatment, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, body mass index, spinal axial diameter, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), spinal mobility, functional status and walking distance (p > 0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, both groups benefited significantly with respect to VAS, functional status and walking distance (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In 45 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who received 8 weeks of treatment, concomitant use of calcitonin with physical therapy and exercise did not have any benefical effect on the patient's pain, functional status, lumbar mobility and walking distance. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2009-10-31 2009-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2768244/ /pubmed/19881973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahin, Fusun
Yilmaz, Figen
Kotevoglu, Nurdan
Kuran, Banu
The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_short The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_sort efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19881973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683
work_keys_str_mv AT sahinfusun theefficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT yilmazfigen theefficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT kotevoglunurdan theefficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT kuranbanu theefficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT sahinfusun efficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT yilmazfigen efficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT kotevoglunurdan efficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis
AT kuranbanu efficacyofphysicaltherapyandphysicaltherapypluscalcitonininthetreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosis