Cargando…
The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock
BACKGROUND: Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-5-38 |
_version_ | 1782173490618564608 |
---|---|
author | Dexter, Glenda Tongue, Sue C Heasman, Lindsay Bellworthy, Susan J Davis, Andrew Moore, S Jo Simmons, Marion M Sayers, A Robin Simmons, Hugh A Matthews, Danny |
author_facet | Dexter, Glenda Tongue, Sue C Heasman, Lindsay Bellworthy, Susan J Davis, Andrew Moore, S Jo Simmons, Marion M Sayers, A Robin Simmons, Hugh A Matthews, Danny |
author_sort | Dexter, Glenda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing control strategies. This study attempted to define which parts of the annual flock management cycle represented the greatest risk of infection to naive lambs exposed to the farm environment at different times. RESULTS: In VRQ/VRQ lambs exposed to infected sheep at pasture or during lambing, and exposed to the buildings in which lambing took place, the attack rate was high and survival times were short. Where exposure was to pasture alone the number of sheep affected in each experimental group was reduced, and survival times were longer and related to length of exposure. CONCLUSION: At the flock level, eradication and control strategies for scrapie must take into account the need to decontaminate buildings used for lambing, and to reduce (or prevent) the exposure of lambs to infected sheep, especially in the later stages of incubation, and at lambing. The potential for environmental contamination from pasture should also be considered. Genotype selection may still prove to be the only viable tool to prevent infection from contaminated pasture, reduce environmental contamination and limit direct transmission from sheep to sheep. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2768688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27686882009-10-28 The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock Dexter, Glenda Tongue, Sue C Heasman, Lindsay Bellworthy, Susan J Davis, Andrew Moore, S Jo Simmons, Marion M Sayers, A Robin Simmons, Hugh A Matthews, Danny BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing control strategies. This study attempted to define which parts of the annual flock management cycle represented the greatest risk of infection to naive lambs exposed to the farm environment at different times. RESULTS: In VRQ/VRQ lambs exposed to infected sheep at pasture or during lambing, and exposed to the buildings in which lambing took place, the attack rate was high and survival times were short. Where exposure was to pasture alone the number of sheep affected in each experimental group was reduced, and survival times were longer and related to length of exposure. CONCLUSION: At the flock level, eradication and control strategies for scrapie must take into account the need to decontaminate buildings used for lambing, and to reduce (or prevent) the exposure of lambs to infected sheep, especially in the later stages of incubation, and at lambing. The potential for environmental contamination from pasture should also be considered. Genotype selection may still prove to be the only viable tool to prevent infection from contaminated pasture, reduce environmental contamination and limit direct transmission from sheep to sheep. BioMed Central 2009-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2768688/ /pubmed/19818127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-5-38 Text en Copyright © 2009 Dexter et al; Crown copyright, licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dexter, Glenda Tongue, Sue C Heasman, Lindsay Bellworthy, Susan J Davis, Andrew Moore, S Jo Simmons, Marion M Sayers, A Robin Simmons, Hugh A Matthews, Danny The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title | The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title_full | The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title_short | The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
title_sort | evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-5-38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dexterglenda theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT tonguesuec theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT heasmanlindsay theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT bellworthysusanj theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT davisandrew theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT mooresjo theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT simmonsmarionm theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT sayersarobin theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT simmonshugha theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT matthewsdanny theevaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT dexterglenda evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT tonguesuec evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT heasmanlindsay evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT bellworthysusanj evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT davisandrew evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT mooresjo evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT simmonsmarionm evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT sayersarobin evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT simmonshugha evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock AT matthewsdanny evaluationofexposurerisksfornaturaltransmissionofscrapiewithinaninfectedflock |