Cargando…

Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models

The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reesink, Ger, Singer, Ruth, Dunn, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241
_version_ 1782173622186541056
author Reesink, Ger
Singer, Ruth
Dunn, Michael
author_facet Reesink, Ger
Singer, Ruth
Dunn, Michael
author_sort Reesink, Ger
collection PubMed
description The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hundreds of languages from many apparently unrelated families. On each of the subcontinents, the generally accepted classification recognizes one large, widespread family and a number of unrelatable smaller families. If these language families are related to each other, it is at a depth which is inaccessible to standard linguistic methods. We have inferred the history of structural characteristics of these languages under an admixture model, using a Bayesian algorithm originally developed to discover populations on the basis of recombining genetic markers. This analysis identifies 10 ancestral language populations, some of which can be identified with clearly defined phylogenetic groups. The results also show traces of early dispersals, including hints at ancient connections between Australian languages and some Papuan groups (long hypothesized, never before demonstrated). Systematic language contact effects between members of big phylogenetic groups are also detected, which can in some cases be identified with a diffusional or substrate signal. Most interestingly, however, there remains striking evidence of a phylogenetic signal, with many languages showing negligible amounts of admixture.
format Text
id pubmed-2770058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27700582009-11-17 Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models Reesink, Ger Singer, Ruth Dunn, Michael PLoS Biol Research Article The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hundreds of languages from many apparently unrelated families. On each of the subcontinents, the generally accepted classification recognizes one large, widespread family and a number of unrelatable smaller families. If these language families are related to each other, it is at a depth which is inaccessible to standard linguistic methods. We have inferred the history of structural characteristics of these languages under an admixture model, using a Bayesian algorithm originally developed to discover populations on the basis of recombining genetic markers. This analysis identifies 10 ancestral language populations, some of which can be identified with clearly defined phylogenetic groups. The results also show traces of early dispersals, including hints at ancient connections between Australian languages and some Papuan groups (long hypothesized, never before demonstrated). Systematic language contact effects between members of big phylogenetic groups are also detected, which can in some cases be identified with a diffusional or substrate signal. Most interestingly, however, there remains striking evidence of a phylogenetic signal, with many languages showing negligible amounts of admixture. Public Library of Science 2009-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2770058/ /pubmed/19918360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241 Text en Reesink et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reesink, Ger
Singer, Ruth
Dunn, Michael
Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title_full Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title_fullStr Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title_full_unstemmed Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title_short Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
title_sort explaining the linguistic diversity of sahul using population models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241
work_keys_str_mv AT reesinkger explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels
AT singerruth explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels
AT dunnmichael explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels