Cargando…
Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models
The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hun...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241 |
_version_ | 1782173622186541056 |
---|---|
author | Reesink, Ger Singer, Ruth Dunn, Michael |
author_facet | Reesink, Ger Singer, Ruth Dunn, Michael |
author_sort | Reesink, Ger |
collection | PubMed |
description | The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hundreds of languages from many apparently unrelated families. On each of the subcontinents, the generally accepted classification recognizes one large, widespread family and a number of unrelatable smaller families. If these language families are related to each other, it is at a depth which is inaccessible to standard linguistic methods. We have inferred the history of structural characteristics of these languages under an admixture model, using a Bayesian algorithm originally developed to discover populations on the basis of recombining genetic markers. This analysis identifies 10 ancestral language populations, some of which can be identified with clearly defined phylogenetic groups. The results also show traces of early dispersals, including hints at ancient connections between Australian languages and some Papuan groups (long hypothesized, never before demonstrated). Systematic language contact effects between members of big phylogenetic groups are also detected, which can in some cases be identified with a diffusional or substrate signal. Most interestingly, however, there remains striking evidence of a phylogenetic signal, with many languages showing negligible amounts of admixture. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2770058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27700582009-11-17 Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models Reesink, Ger Singer, Ruth Dunn, Michael PLoS Biol Research Article The region of the ancient Sahul continent (present day Australia and New Guinea, and surrounding islands) is home to extreme linguistic diversity. Even apart from the huge Austronesian language family, which spread into the area after the breakup of the Sahul continent in the Holocene, there are hundreds of languages from many apparently unrelated families. On each of the subcontinents, the generally accepted classification recognizes one large, widespread family and a number of unrelatable smaller families. If these language families are related to each other, it is at a depth which is inaccessible to standard linguistic methods. We have inferred the history of structural characteristics of these languages under an admixture model, using a Bayesian algorithm originally developed to discover populations on the basis of recombining genetic markers. This analysis identifies 10 ancestral language populations, some of which can be identified with clearly defined phylogenetic groups. The results also show traces of early dispersals, including hints at ancient connections between Australian languages and some Papuan groups (long hypothesized, never before demonstrated). Systematic language contact effects between members of big phylogenetic groups are also detected, which can in some cases be identified with a diffusional or substrate signal. Most interestingly, however, there remains striking evidence of a phylogenetic signal, with many languages showing negligible amounts of admixture. Public Library of Science 2009-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2770058/ /pubmed/19918360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241 Text en Reesink et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reesink, Ger Singer, Ruth Dunn, Michael Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title | Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title_full | Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title_fullStr | Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title_short | Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models |
title_sort | explaining the linguistic diversity of sahul using population models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reesinkger explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels AT singerruth explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels AT dunnmichael explainingthelinguisticdiversityofsahulusingpopulationmodels |