Cargando…

Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks

BACKGROUND: In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erten, Sinan, Li, Xin, Bebek, Gurkan, Li, Jing, Koyutürk, Mehmet
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-333
_version_ 1782173625347997696
author Erten, Sinan
Li, Xin
Bebek, Gurkan
Li, Jing
Koyutürk, Mehmet
author_facet Erten, Sinan
Li, Xin
Bebek, Gurkan
Li, Jing
Koyutürk, Mehmet
author_sort Erten, Sinan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity. RESULTS: In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (i) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (ii) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (iii) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, MOPHY, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that MOPHY is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology. CONCLUSION: These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules.
format Text
id pubmed-2770073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27700732009-10-29 Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks Erten, Sinan Li, Xin Bebek, Gurkan Li, Jing Koyutürk, Mehmet BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity. RESULTS: In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (i) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (ii) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (iii) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, MOPHY, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that MOPHY is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology. CONCLUSION: These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules. BioMed Central 2009-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2770073/ /pubmed/19828041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-333 Text en Copyright © 2009 Erten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Erten, Sinan
Li, Xin
Bebek, Gurkan
Li, Jing
Koyutürk, Mehmet
Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_full Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_fullStr Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_short Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
title_sort phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19828041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-333
work_keys_str_mv AT ertensinan phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT lixin phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT bebekgurkan phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT lijing phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks
AT koyuturkmehmet phylogeneticanalysisofmodularityinproteininteractionnetworks