Cargando…

Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings

BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brod, Meryl, Rousculp, Matthew, Cameron, Ann
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920953
_version_ 1782173653417328640
author Brod, Meryl
Rousculp, Matthew
Cameron, Ann
author_facet Brod, Meryl
Rousculp, Matthew
Cameron, Ann
author_sort Brod, Meryl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a model. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative study to generate hypotheses regarding compliance issues for self-injectable treatments. Semi-structured interview guides were developed and data collected from patients and clinical experts. Findings were analyzed for common themes and a conceptual model of the compliance impact of self-injectable treatments generated. SUBJECTS: Six physicians (Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, and Endocrinology) and 22 patients (14% never began treatment, 23% had filled at least one prescription but discontinued treatment, and 63% were currently on treatment) were interviewed. RESULTS: Physician and patient factors influenced the compliance process at four distinct time-points: pre-treatment, time treatment recommended, short-term, and long-term. Physician factors that influenced patients’ persistence were knowledge about treatment, patient-training resources, and clinical profile/efficacy evaluations. For patients, motivation level, physician message, and clinical profile were key. Logistical issues, minor side effects and injection site issues influenced adherence but not persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance is a multifactorial, dynamic process. Both physician and patient factors influence compliance at different points in the process.
format Text
id pubmed-2770412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27704122009-11-17 Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings Brod, Meryl Rousculp, Matthew Cameron, Ann Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a model. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative study to generate hypotheses regarding compliance issues for self-injectable treatments. Semi-structured interview guides were developed and data collected from patients and clinical experts. Findings were analyzed for common themes and a conceptual model of the compliance impact of self-injectable treatments generated. SUBJECTS: Six physicians (Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, and Endocrinology) and 22 patients (14% never began treatment, 23% had filled at least one prescription but discontinued treatment, and 63% were currently on treatment) were interviewed. RESULTS: Physician and patient factors influenced the compliance process at four distinct time-points: pre-treatment, time treatment recommended, short-term, and long-term. Physician factors that influenced patients’ persistence were knowledge about treatment, patient-training resources, and clinical profile/efficacy evaluations. For patients, motivation level, physician message, and clinical profile were key. Logistical issues, minor side effects and injection site issues influenced adherence but not persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance is a multifactorial, dynamic process. Both physician and patient factors influence compliance at different points in the process. Dove Medical Press 2008-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2770412/ /pubmed/19920953 Text en © 2008 Brod et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brod, Meryl
Rousculp, Matthew
Cameron, Ann
Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title_full Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title_fullStr Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title_full_unstemmed Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title_short Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
title_sort understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920953
work_keys_str_mv AT brodmeryl understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings
AT rousculpmatthew understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings
AT cameronann understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings