Cargando…
Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings
BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920953 |
_version_ | 1782173653417328640 |
---|---|
author | Brod, Meryl Rousculp, Matthew Cameron, Ann |
author_facet | Brod, Meryl Rousculp, Matthew Cameron, Ann |
author_sort | Brod, Meryl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a model. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative study to generate hypotheses regarding compliance issues for self-injectable treatments. Semi-structured interview guides were developed and data collected from patients and clinical experts. Findings were analyzed for common themes and a conceptual model of the compliance impact of self-injectable treatments generated. SUBJECTS: Six physicians (Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, and Endocrinology) and 22 patients (14% never began treatment, 23% had filled at least one prescription but discontinued treatment, and 63% were currently on treatment) were interviewed. RESULTS: Physician and patient factors influenced the compliance process at four distinct time-points: pre-treatment, time treatment recommended, short-term, and long-term. Physician factors that influenced patients’ persistence were knowledge about treatment, patient-training resources, and clinical profile/efficacy evaluations. For patients, motivation level, physician message, and clinical profile were key. Logistical issues, minor side effects and injection site issues influenced adherence but not persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance is a multifactorial, dynamic process. Both physician and patient factors influence compliance at different points in the process. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2770412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27704122009-11-17 Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings Brod, Meryl Rousculp, Matthew Cameron, Ann Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The challenge of understanding factors influencing compliance with injectable treatments is critical as injectable biologics/medications become more common. OBJECTIVE: Understanding compliance issues for long term self-injectable treatments, using a chronic condition (osteoporosis) as a model. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative study to generate hypotheses regarding compliance issues for self-injectable treatments. Semi-structured interview guides were developed and data collected from patients and clinical experts. Findings were analyzed for common themes and a conceptual model of the compliance impact of self-injectable treatments generated. SUBJECTS: Six physicians (Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, and Endocrinology) and 22 patients (14% never began treatment, 23% had filled at least one prescription but discontinued treatment, and 63% were currently on treatment) were interviewed. RESULTS: Physician and patient factors influenced the compliance process at four distinct time-points: pre-treatment, time treatment recommended, short-term, and long-term. Physician factors that influenced patients’ persistence were knowledge about treatment, patient-training resources, and clinical profile/efficacy evaluations. For patients, motivation level, physician message, and clinical profile were key. Logistical issues, minor side effects and injection site issues influenced adherence but not persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance is a multifactorial, dynamic process. Both physician and patient factors influence compliance at different points in the process. Dove Medical Press 2008-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2770412/ /pubmed/19920953 Text en © 2008 Brod et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Brod, Meryl Rousculp, Matthew Cameron, Ann Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title | Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title_full | Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title_fullStr | Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title_short | Understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
title_sort | understanding compliance issues for daily self-injectable treatment in ambulatory care settings |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brodmeryl understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings AT rousculpmatthew understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings AT cameronann understandingcomplianceissuesfordailyselfinjectabletreatmentinambulatorycaresettings |