Cargando…

Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been advocated as an effective means to provide health care services over a distance. Systematic information on costs and consequences has been called for to support decision-making in this field. This paper provides a review of the quality, validity and generalisability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bergmo, Trine S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-7-18
_version_ 1782173658654965760
author Bergmo, Trine S
author_facet Bergmo, Trine S
author_sort Bergmo, Trine S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been advocated as an effective means to provide health care services over a distance. Systematic information on costs and consequences has been called for to support decision-making in this field. This paper provides a review of the quality, validity and generalisability of economic evaluations in telemedicine. METHODS: A systematic literature search in all relevant databases was conducted and forms the basis for addressing these issues. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals and written in English in the period from 1990 to 2007 were analysed. The literature search identified 33 economic evaluations where both costs (resource use) and outcomes (non-resource consequences) were measured. RESULTS: This review shows that economic evaluations in telemedicine are highly diverse in terms of both the study context and the methods applied. The articles covered several medical specialities ranging from cardiology and dermatology to psychiatry. The studies analysed telemedicine in home care, and in primary and secondary care settings using a variety of different technologies including videoconferencing, still-images and monitoring (store-and-forward telemedicine). Most studies used multiple outcome measures and analysed the effects using disaggregated cost-consequence frameworks. Objectives, study design, and choice of comparators were mostly well reported. The majority of the studies lacked information on perspective and costing method, few used general statistics and sensitivity analysis to assess validity, and even fewer used marginal analysis. CONCLUSION: As this paper demonstrates, the majority of the economic evaluations reviewed were not in accordance with standard evaluation techniques. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for this and to address how economic evaluation in telemedicine best can take advantage of local constraints and at the same time produce valid and generalisable results.
format Text
id pubmed-2770451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27704512009-10-30 Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature Bergmo, Trine S Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been advocated as an effective means to provide health care services over a distance. Systematic information on costs and consequences has been called for to support decision-making in this field. This paper provides a review of the quality, validity and generalisability of economic evaluations in telemedicine. METHODS: A systematic literature search in all relevant databases was conducted and forms the basis for addressing these issues. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals and written in English in the period from 1990 to 2007 were analysed. The literature search identified 33 economic evaluations where both costs (resource use) and outcomes (non-resource consequences) were measured. RESULTS: This review shows that economic evaluations in telemedicine are highly diverse in terms of both the study context and the methods applied. The articles covered several medical specialities ranging from cardiology and dermatology to psychiatry. The studies analysed telemedicine in home care, and in primary and secondary care settings using a variety of different technologies including videoconferencing, still-images and monitoring (store-and-forward telemedicine). Most studies used multiple outcome measures and analysed the effects using disaggregated cost-consequence frameworks. Objectives, study design, and choice of comparators were mostly well reported. The majority of the studies lacked information on perspective and costing method, few used general statistics and sensitivity analysis to assess validity, and even fewer used marginal analysis. CONCLUSION: As this paper demonstrates, the majority of the economic evaluations reviewed were not in accordance with standard evaluation techniques. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for this and to address how economic evaluation in telemedicine best can take advantage of local constraints and at the same time produce valid and generalisable results. BioMed Central 2009-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2770451/ /pubmed/19852828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-7-18 Text en Copyright © 2009 Bergmo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Bergmo, Trine S
Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title_full Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title_short Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
title_sort can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-7-18
work_keys_str_mv AT bergmotrines caneconomicevaluationintelemedicinebetrustedasystematicreviewoftheliterature