Cargando…

A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND: Computed Tomography (CT) has become a widely used supplement to medico legal autopsies at several forensic institutes. Amongst other things, it has proven to be very valuable in visualising fractures of the cranium. Also CT scan data are being used to create head models for biomechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobsen, Christina, Bech, Birthe H, Lynnerup, Niels
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19835570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-9-18
_version_ 1782173659126824960
author Jacobsen, Christina
Bech, Birthe H
Lynnerup, Niels
author_facet Jacobsen, Christina
Bech, Birthe H
Lynnerup, Niels
author_sort Jacobsen, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computed Tomography (CT) has become a widely used supplement to medico legal autopsies at several forensic institutes. Amongst other things, it has proven to be very valuable in visualising fractures of the cranium. Also CT scan data are being used to create head models for biomechanical trauma analysis by Finite Element Analysis. If CT scan data are to be used for creating individual head models for retrograde trauma analysis in the future we need to ascertain how well cranial fractures are captured by CT scan. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic agreement between CT and autopsy regarding cranial fractures and especially the precision with which cranial fractures are recorded. METHODS: The autopsy fracture diagnosis was compared to the diagnosis of two CT readings (reconstructed with Multiplanar and Maximum Intensity Projection reconstructions) by registering the fractures on schematic drawings. The extent of the fractures was quantified by merging 3-dimensional datasets from both the autopsy as input by 3D digitizer tracing and CT scan. RESULTS: The results showed a good diagnostic agreement regarding fractures localised in the posterior fossa, while the fracture diagnosis in the medial and anterior fossa was difficult at the first CT scan reading. The fracture diagnosis improved during the second CT scan reading. Thus using two different CT reconstructions improved diagnosis in the medial fossa and at the impact points in the cranial vault. However, fracture diagnosis in the anterior and medial fossa and of hairline fractures in general still remained difficult. CONCLUSION: The study showed that the forensically important fracture systems to a large extent were diagnosed on CT images using Multiplanar and Maximum Intensity Projection reconstructions. Difficulties remained in the minute diagnosis of hairline fractures. These inconsistencies need to be resolved in order to use CT scan data of victims for individual head modelling and trauma analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-2770453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27704532009-10-30 A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography Jacobsen, Christina Bech, Birthe H Lynnerup, Niels BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Computed Tomography (CT) has become a widely used supplement to medico legal autopsies at several forensic institutes. Amongst other things, it has proven to be very valuable in visualising fractures of the cranium. Also CT scan data are being used to create head models for biomechanical trauma analysis by Finite Element Analysis. If CT scan data are to be used for creating individual head models for retrograde trauma analysis in the future we need to ascertain how well cranial fractures are captured by CT scan. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic agreement between CT and autopsy regarding cranial fractures and especially the precision with which cranial fractures are recorded. METHODS: The autopsy fracture diagnosis was compared to the diagnosis of two CT readings (reconstructed with Multiplanar and Maximum Intensity Projection reconstructions) by registering the fractures on schematic drawings. The extent of the fractures was quantified by merging 3-dimensional datasets from both the autopsy as input by 3D digitizer tracing and CT scan. RESULTS: The results showed a good diagnostic agreement regarding fractures localised in the posterior fossa, while the fracture diagnosis in the medial and anterior fossa was difficult at the first CT scan reading. The fracture diagnosis improved during the second CT scan reading. Thus using two different CT reconstructions improved diagnosis in the medial fossa and at the impact points in the cranial vault. However, fracture diagnosis in the anterior and medial fossa and of hairline fractures in general still remained difficult. CONCLUSION: The study showed that the forensically important fracture systems to a large extent were diagnosed on CT images using Multiplanar and Maximum Intensity Projection reconstructions. Difficulties remained in the minute diagnosis of hairline fractures. These inconsistencies need to be resolved in order to use CT scan data of victims for individual head modelling and trauma analysis. BioMed Central 2009-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2770453/ /pubmed/19835570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-9-18 Text en Copyright ©2009 Jacobsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jacobsen, Christina
Bech, Birthe H
Lynnerup, Niels
A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title_full A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title_fullStr A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title_short A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by Computed Tomography
title_sort comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by computed tomography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19835570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-9-18
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsenchristina acomparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography
AT bechbirtheh acomparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography
AT lynnerupniels acomparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography
AT jacobsenchristina comparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography
AT bechbirtheh comparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography
AT lynnerupniels comparativestudyofcranialblunttraumafracturesasseenatmedicolegalautopsyandbycomputedtomography