Cargando…

Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stiell, Ian G, Clement, Catherine M, Grimshaw, Jeremy, Brison, Robert J, Rowe, Brian H, Schull, Michael J, Lee, Jacques S, Brehaut, Jamie, McKnight, R Douglas, Eisenhauer, Mary A, Dreyer, Jonathan, Letovsky, Eric, Rutledge, Tim, MacPhail, Iain, Ross, Scott, Shah, Amit, Perry, Jeffrey J, Holroyd, Brian R, Ip, Urbain, Lesiuk, Howard, Wells, George A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146
_version_ 1782173688267800576
author Stiell, Ian G
Clement, Catherine M
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Brison, Robert J
Rowe, Brian H
Schull, Michael J
Lee, Jacques S
Brehaut, Jamie
McKnight, R Douglas
Eisenhauer, Mary A
Dreyer, Jonathan
Letovsky, Eric
Rutledge, Tim
MacPhail, Iain
Ross, Scott
Shah, Amit
Perry, Jeffrey J
Holroyd, Brian R
Ip, Urbain
Lesiuk, Howard
Wells, George A
author_facet Stiell, Ian G
Clement, Catherine M
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Brison, Robert J
Rowe, Brian H
Schull, Michael J
Lee, Jacques S
Brehaut, Jamie
McKnight, R Douglas
Eisenhauer, Mary A
Dreyer, Jonathan
Letovsky, Eric
Rutledge, Tim
MacPhail, Iain
Ross, Scott
Shah, Amit
Perry, Jeffrey J
Holroyd, Brian R
Ip, Urbain
Lesiuk, Howard
Wells, George A
author_sort Stiell, Ian G
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adults presenting with blunt trauma to the head or neck at one of 12 hospitals. Interventions Six hospitals were randomly allocated to the intervention and six to the control. At the intervention sites, active strategies were used to implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule, including education, policy, and real time reminders on radiology requisitions. No specific intervention was introduced to alter the behaviour of doctors requesting cervical spine imaging at the control sites. Main outcome measure Diagnostic imaging rate of the cervical spine during two 12 month before and after periods. Results Patients were balanced between control and intervention sites. From the before to the after periods, the intervention group showed a relative reduction in cervical spine imaging of 12.8% (95% confidence interval 9% to 16%; 61.7% v 53.3%; P=0.01) and the control group a relative increase of 12.5% (7% to 18%; 52.8% v 58.9%; P=0.03). These changes were significant when both groups were compared (P<0.001). No fractures were missed and no adverse outcomes occurred. Conclusions Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule led to a significant decrease in imaging without injuries being missed or patient morbidity. Final imaging rates were much lower at intervention sites than at most US hospitals. Widespread implementation of this rule could lead to reduced healthcare costs and more efficient patient flow in busy emergency departments worldwide. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00290875.
format Text
id pubmed-2770593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27705932009-11-20 Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial Stiell, Ian G Clement, Catherine M Grimshaw, Jeremy Brison, Robert J Rowe, Brian H Schull, Michael J Lee, Jacques S Brehaut, Jamie McKnight, R Douglas Eisenhauer, Mary A Dreyer, Jonathan Letovsky, Eric Rutledge, Tim MacPhail, Iain Ross, Scott Shah, Amit Perry, Jeffrey J Holroyd, Brian R Ip, Urbain Lesiuk, Howard Wells, George A BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adults presenting with blunt trauma to the head or neck at one of 12 hospitals. Interventions Six hospitals were randomly allocated to the intervention and six to the control. At the intervention sites, active strategies were used to implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule, including education, policy, and real time reminders on radiology requisitions. No specific intervention was introduced to alter the behaviour of doctors requesting cervical spine imaging at the control sites. Main outcome measure Diagnostic imaging rate of the cervical spine during two 12 month before and after periods. Results Patients were balanced between control and intervention sites. From the before to the after periods, the intervention group showed a relative reduction in cervical spine imaging of 12.8% (95% confidence interval 9% to 16%; 61.7% v 53.3%; P=0.01) and the control group a relative increase of 12.5% (7% to 18%; 52.8% v 58.9%; P=0.03). These changes were significant when both groups were compared (P<0.001). No fractures were missed and no adverse outcomes occurred. Conclusions Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule led to a significant decrease in imaging without injuries being missed or patient morbidity. Final imaging rates were much lower at intervention sites than at most US hospitals. Widespread implementation of this rule could lead to reduced healthcare costs and more efficient patient flow in busy emergency departments worldwide. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00290875. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2770593/ /pubmed/19875425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Stiell, Ian G
Clement, Catherine M
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Brison, Robert J
Rowe, Brian H
Schull, Michael J
Lee, Jacques S
Brehaut, Jamie
McKnight, R Douglas
Eisenhauer, Mary A
Dreyer, Jonathan
Letovsky, Eric
Rutledge, Tim
MacPhail, Iain
Ross, Scott
Shah, Amit
Perry, Jeffrey J
Holroyd, Brian R
Ip, Urbain
Lesiuk, Howard
Wells, George A
Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title_full Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title_short Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
title_sort implementation of the canadian c-spine rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146
work_keys_str_mv AT stielliang implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT clementcatherinem implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT grimshawjeremy implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT brisonrobertj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT rowebrianh implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT schullmichaelj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT leejacquess implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT brehautjamie implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT mcknightrdouglas implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT eisenhauermarya implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT dreyerjonathan implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT letovskyeric implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT rutledgetim implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT macphailiain implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT rossscott implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT shahamit implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT perryjeffreyj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT holroydbrianr implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT ipurbain implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT lesiukhoward implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial
AT wellsgeorgea implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial