Cargando…
Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146 |
_version_ | 1782173688267800576 |
---|---|
author | Stiell, Ian G Clement, Catherine M Grimshaw, Jeremy Brison, Robert J Rowe, Brian H Schull, Michael J Lee, Jacques S Brehaut, Jamie McKnight, R Douglas Eisenhauer, Mary A Dreyer, Jonathan Letovsky, Eric Rutledge, Tim MacPhail, Iain Ross, Scott Shah, Amit Perry, Jeffrey J Holroyd, Brian R Ip, Urbain Lesiuk, Howard Wells, George A |
author_facet | Stiell, Ian G Clement, Catherine M Grimshaw, Jeremy Brison, Robert J Rowe, Brian H Schull, Michael J Lee, Jacques S Brehaut, Jamie McKnight, R Douglas Eisenhauer, Mary A Dreyer, Jonathan Letovsky, Eric Rutledge, Tim MacPhail, Iain Ross, Scott Shah, Amit Perry, Jeffrey J Holroyd, Brian R Ip, Urbain Lesiuk, Howard Wells, George A |
author_sort | Stiell, Ian G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adults presenting with blunt trauma to the head or neck at one of 12 hospitals. Interventions Six hospitals were randomly allocated to the intervention and six to the control. At the intervention sites, active strategies were used to implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule, including education, policy, and real time reminders on radiology requisitions. No specific intervention was introduced to alter the behaviour of doctors requesting cervical spine imaging at the control sites. Main outcome measure Diagnostic imaging rate of the cervical spine during two 12 month before and after periods. Results Patients were balanced between control and intervention sites. From the before to the after periods, the intervention group showed a relative reduction in cervical spine imaging of 12.8% (95% confidence interval 9% to 16%; 61.7% v 53.3%; P=0.01) and the control group a relative increase of 12.5% (7% to 18%; 52.8% v 58.9%; P=0.03). These changes were significant when both groups were compared (P<0.001). No fractures were missed and no adverse outcomes occurred. Conclusions Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule led to a significant decrease in imaging without injuries being missed or patient morbidity. Final imaging rates were much lower at intervention sites than at most US hospitals. Widespread implementation of this rule could lead to reduced healthcare costs and more efficient patient flow in busy emergency departments worldwide. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00290875. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2770593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27705932009-11-20 Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial Stiell, Ian G Clement, Catherine M Grimshaw, Jeremy Brison, Robert J Rowe, Brian H Schull, Michael J Lee, Jacques S Brehaut, Jamie McKnight, R Douglas Eisenhauer, Mary A Dreyer, Jonathan Letovsky, Eric Rutledge, Tim MacPhail, Iain Ross, Scott Shah, Amit Perry, Jeffrey J Holroyd, Brian R Ip, Urbain Lesiuk, Howard Wells, George A BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the validated Canadian C-Spine Rule into multiple emergency departments. Design Matched pair cluster randomised trial. Setting University and community emergency departments in Canada. Participants 11 824 alert and stable adults presenting with blunt trauma to the head or neck at one of 12 hospitals. Interventions Six hospitals were randomly allocated to the intervention and six to the control. At the intervention sites, active strategies were used to implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule, including education, policy, and real time reminders on radiology requisitions. No specific intervention was introduced to alter the behaviour of doctors requesting cervical spine imaging at the control sites. Main outcome measure Diagnostic imaging rate of the cervical spine during two 12 month before and after periods. Results Patients were balanced between control and intervention sites. From the before to the after periods, the intervention group showed a relative reduction in cervical spine imaging of 12.8% (95% confidence interval 9% to 16%; 61.7% v 53.3%; P=0.01) and the control group a relative increase of 12.5% (7% to 18%; 52.8% v 58.9%; P=0.03). These changes were significant when both groups were compared (P<0.001). No fractures were missed and no adverse outcomes occurred. Conclusions Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule led to a significant decrease in imaging without injuries being missed or patient morbidity. Final imaging rates were much lower at intervention sites than at most US hospitals. Widespread implementation of this rule could lead to reduced healthcare costs and more efficient patient flow in busy emergency departments worldwide. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00290875. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2770593/ /pubmed/19875425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Stiell, Ian G Clement, Catherine M Grimshaw, Jeremy Brison, Robert J Rowe, Brian H Schull, Michael J Lee, Jacques S Brehaut, Jamie McKnight, R Douglas Eisenhauer, Mary A Dreyer, Jonathan Letovsky, Eric Rutledge, Tim MacPhail, Iain Ross, Scott Shah, Amit Perry, Jeffrey J Holroyd, Brian R Ip, Urbain Lesiuk, Howard Wells, George A Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title_full | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title_short | Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
title_sort | implementation of the canadian c-spine rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stielliang implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT clementcatherinem implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT grimshawjeremy implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT brisonrobertj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT rowebrianh implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT schullmichaelj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT leejacquess implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT brehautjamie implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT mcknightrdouglas implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT eisenhauermarya implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT dreyerjonathan implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT letovskyeric implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT rutledgetim implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT macphailiain implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT rossscott implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT shahamit implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT perryjeffreyj implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT holroydbrianr implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT ipurbain implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT lesiukhoward implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial AT wellsgeorgea implementationofthecanadiancspineruleprospective12centreclusterrandomisedtrial |