Cargando…

Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: A gap continues to exist between what is known to be effective and what is actually delivered in the usual course of medical care. The goal of implementation research is to reduce this gap. However, a tension exists between the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge through implementati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leykum, Luci K, Pugh, Jacqueline A, Lanham, Holly J, Harmon, Joel, McDaniel, Reuben R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69
_version_ 1782173710541651968
author Leykum, Luci K
Pugh, Jacqueline A
Lanham, Holly J
Harmon, Joel
McDaniel, Reuben R
author_facet Leykum, Luci K
Pugh, Jacqueline A
Lanham, Holly J
Harmon, Joel
McDaniel, Reuben R
author_sort Leykum, Luci K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A gap continues to exist between what is known to be effective and what is actually delivered in the usual course of medical care. The goal of implementation research is to reduce this gap. However, a tension exists between the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge through implementation trials, and the inherent differences between healthcare organizations that make standard interventional approaches less likely to succeed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the integration of participatory action research and randomized controlled trial (RCT) study designs to suggest a new approach for studying interventions in healthcare settings. DISCUSSION: We summarize key elements of participatory action research, with particular attention to its collaborative, reflective approach. Elements of participatory action research and RCT study designs are discussed and contrasted, with a complex adaptive systems approach used to frame their integration. SUMMARY: The integration of participatory action research and RCT design results in a new approach that reflects not only the complex nature of healthcare organizations, but also the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge regarding the implementation process.
format Text
id pubmed-2770984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27709842009-10-31 Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials Leykum, Luci K Pugh, Jacqueline A Lanham, Holly J Harmon, Joel McDaniel, Reuben R Implement Sci Debate BACKGROUND: A gap continues to exist between what is known to be effective and what is actually delivered in the usual course of medical care. The goal of implementation research is to reduce this gap. However, a tension exists between the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge through implementation trials, and the inherent differences between healthcare organizations that make standard interventional approaches less likely to succeed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the integration of participatory action research and randomized controlled trial (RCT) study designs to suggest a new approach for studying interventions in healthcare settings. DISCUSSION: We summarize key elements of participatory action research, with particular attention to its collaborative, reflective approach. Elements of participatory action research and RCT study designs are discussed and contrasted, with a complex adaptive systems approach used to frame their integration. SUMMARY: The integration of participatory action research and RCT design results in a new approach that reflects not only the complex nature of healthcare organizations, but also the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge regarding the implementation process. BioMed Central 2009-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2770984/ /pubmed/19852784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69 Text en Copyright © 2009 Leykum et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Leykum, Luci K
Pugh, Jacqueline A
Lanham, Holly J
Harmon, Joel
McDaniel, Reuben R
Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title_full Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title_short Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
title_sort implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69
work_keys_str_mv AT leykumlucik implementationresearchdesignintegratingparticipatoryactionresearchintorandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT pughjacquelinea implementationresearchdesignintegratingparticipatoryactionresearchintorandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lanhamhollyj implementationresearchdesignintegratingparticipatoryactionresearchintorandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT harmonjoel implementationresearchdesignintegratingparticipatoryactionresearchintorandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mcdanielreubenr implementationresearchdesignintegratingparticipatoryactionresearchintorandomizedcontrolledtrials