Cargando…

Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 15 minutes of immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting One academic teaching hospital and six non-academic teaching hospitals. Participants Women having intrauterine inseminati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Custers, Inge M, Flierman, Paul A, Maas, Pettie, Cox, Tessa, Van Dessel, Thierry J H M, Gerards, Mariette H, Mochtar, Monique H, Janssen, Catharina A H, van der Veen, Fulco, Mol, Ben Willem J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4080
_version_ 1782173726813454336
author Custers, Inge M
Flierman, Paul A
Maas, Pettie
Cox, Tessa
Van Dessel, Thierry J H M
Gerards, Mariette H
Mochtar, Monique H
Janssen, Catharina A H
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben Willem J
author_facet Custers, Inge M
Flierman, Paul A
Maas, Pettie
Cox, Tessa
Van Dessel, Thierry J H M
Gerards, Mariette H
Mochtar, Monique H
Janssen, Catharina A H
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben Willem J
author_sort Custers, Inge M
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 15 minutes of immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting One academic teaching hospital and six non-academic teaching hospitals. Participants Women having intrauterine insemination for unexplained, cervical factor, or male subfertility. Interventions 15 minutes of immobilisation or immediate mobilisation after insemination. Main outcome measure Ongoing pregnancy per couple. Results 391 couples were randomised; 199 couples were allocated to 15 minutes of immobilisation after intrauterine insemination, and 192 couples were allocated to immediate mobilisation (control). The ongoing pregnancy rate per couple was significantly higher in the immobilisation group than in the control group: 27% (n=54) versus 18% (34); relative risk 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.2 (crude difference in ongoing pregnancy rates: 9.4%, 1.2% to 17%). Live birth rates were 27% (53) in the immobilisation group and 17% (32) in the control group: relative risk 1.6, 1.1 to 2.4 (crude difference for live birth rates: 10%, 1.8% to 18%). In the immobilisation group, the ongoing pregnancy rates in the first, second, and third treatment cycles were 10%, 10%, and 7%. The corresponding rates in the mobilisation group were 7%, 5%, and 5%. Conclusion In treatment with intrauterine insemination, 15 minutes’ immobilisation after insemination is an effective modification. Immobilisation for 15 minutes should be offered to all women treated with intrauterine insemination. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN53294431.
format Text
id pubmed-2771078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27710782009-11-20 Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial Custers, Inge M Flierman, Paul A Maas, Pettie Cox, Tessa Van Dessel, Thierry J H M Gerards, Mariette H Mochtar, Monique H Janssen, Catharina A H van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben Willem J BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 15 minutes of immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting One academic teaching hospital and six non-academic teaching hospitals. Participants Women having intrauterine insemination for unexplained, cervical factor, or male subfertility. Interventions 15 minutes of immobilisation or immediate mobilisation after insemination. Main outcome measure Ongoing pregnancy per couple. Results 391 couples were randomised; 199 couples were allocated to 15 minutes of immobilisation after intrauterine insemination, and 192 couples were allocated to immediate mobilisation (control). The ongoing pregnancy rate per couple was significantly higher in the immobilisation group than in the control group: 27% (n=54) versus 18% (34); relative risk 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.2 (crude difference in ongoing pregnancy rates: 9.4%, 1.2% to 17%). Live birth rates were 27% (53) in the immobilisation group and 17% (32) in the control group: relative risk 1.6, 1.1 to 2.4 (crude difference for live birth rates: 10%, 1.8% to 18%). In the immobilisation group, the ongoing pregnancy rates in the first, second, and third treatment cycles were 10%, 10%, and 7%. The corresponding rates in the mobilisation group were 7%, 5%, and 5%. Conclusion In treatment with intrauterine insemination, 15 minutes’ immobilisation after insemination is an effective modification. Immobilisation for 15 minutes should be offered to all women treated with intrauterine insemination. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN53294431. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2771078/ /pubmed/19875843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4080 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Custers, Inge M
Flierman, Paul A
Maas, Pettie
Cox, Tessa
Van Dessel, Thierry J H M
Gerards, Mariette H
Mochtar, Monique H
Janssen, Catharina A H
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben Willem J
Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title_full Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title_short Immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
title_sort immobilisation versus immediate mobilisation after intrauterine insemination: randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4080
work_keys_str_mv AT custersingem immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fliermanpaula immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maaspettie immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coxtessa immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandesselthierryjhm immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gerardsmarietteh immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mochtarmoniqueh immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janssencatharinaah immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderveenfulco immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT molbenwillemj immobilisationversusimmediatemobilisationafterintrauterineinseminationrandomisedcontrolledtrial