Cargando…
Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer
The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for hereditary cancer is subject to on-going debate, particularly among professionals. This study evaluates the attitude towards PGD and attitude-associated characteristics of those concerned: family members with a hereditary cancer predisposition....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19642022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9265-5 |
_version_ | 1782173730392244224 |
---|---|
author | Lammens, Chantal Bleiker, Eveline Aaronson, Neil Vriends, Annette Ausems, Margreet Jansweijer, Maaike Wagner, Anja Sijmons, Rolf van den Ouweland, Ans van der Luijt, Rob Spruijt, Liesbeth Gómez García, Encarna Ruijs, Mariëlle Verhoef, Senno |
author_facet | Lammens, Chantal Bleiker, Eveline Aaronson, Neil Vriends, Annette Ausems, Margreet Jansweijer, Maaike Wagner, Anja Sijmons, Rolf van den Ouweland, Ans van der Luijt, Rob Spruijt, Liesbeth Gómez García, Encarna Ruijs, Mariëlle Verhoef, Senno |
author_sort | Lammens, Chantal |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for hereditary cancer is subject to on-going debate, particularly among professionals. This study evaluates the attitude towards PGD and attitude-associated characteristics of those concerned: family members with a hereditary cancer predisposition. Forty-eight Von Hippel-Lindau and 18 Li–Fraumeni Syndrome families were identified via the 9 family cancer clinics in the Netherlands. In total, 216 high risk family members and partners were approached, of whom 179 (83%) completed a self-report questionnaire. Of the high risk family members, 35% expressed a positive attitude towards PGD. Those with a current desire to have children were significantly more likely to have a positive attitude: 48% would consider the use of PGD. No other sociodemographic, medical or psychosocial variables were associated significantly with a positive attitude. The most frequently reported advantage of PGD is the avoidance of a possible pregnancy termination. Uncertainty about late effects was the most frequently reported disadvantage. These results indicate that approximately half of those contemplating a future pregnancy would consider the use of PGD. The actual uptake, however, is expected to be lower. There is no indication that psychosocial factors affect interest in PGD. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2771132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27711322009-11-06 Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer Lammens, Chantal Bleiker, Eveline Aaronson, Neil Vriends, Annette Ausems, Margreet Jansweijer, Maaike Wagner, Anja Sijmons, Rolf van den Ouweland, Ans van der Luijt, Rob Spruijt, Liesbeth Gómez García, Encarna Ruijs, Mariëlle Verhoef, Senno Fam Cancer Article The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for hereditary cancer is subject to on-going debate, particularly among professionals. This study evaluates the attitude towards PGD and attitude-associated characteristics of those concerned: family members with a hereditary cancer predisposition. Forty-eight Von Hippel-Lindau and 18 Li–Fraumeni Syndrome families were identified via the 9 family cancer clinics in the Netherlands. In total, 216 high risk family members and partners were approached, of whom 179 (83%) completed a self-report questionnaire. Of the high risk family members, 35% expressed a positive attitude towards PGD. Those with a current desire to have children were significantly more likely to have a positive attitude: 48% would consider the use of PGD. No other sociodemographic, medical or psychosocial variables were associated significantly with a positive attitude. The most frequently reported advantage of PGD is the avoidance of a possible pregnancy termination. Uncertainty about late effects was the most frequently reported disadvantage. These results indicate that approximately half of those contemplating a future pregnancy would consider the use of PGD. The actual uptake, however, is expected to be lower. There is no indication that psychosocial factors affect interest in PGD. Springer Netherlands 2009-07-30 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2771132/ /pubmed/19642022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9265-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Lammens, Chantal Bleiker, Eveline Aaronson, Neil Vriends, Annette Ausems, Margreet Jansweijer, Maaike Wagner, Anja Sijmons, Rolf van den Ouweland, Ans van der Luijt, Rob Spruijt, Liesbeth Gómez García, Encarna Ruijs, Mariëlle Verhoef, Senno Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title | Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title_full | Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title_fullStr | Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title_short | Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
title_sort | attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19642022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9265-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lammenschantal attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT bleikereveline attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT aaronsonneil attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT vriendsannette attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT ausemsmargreet attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT jansweijermaaike attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT wagneranja attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT sijmonsrolf attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT vandenouwelandans attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT vanderluijtrob attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT spruijtliesbeth attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT gomezgarciaencarna attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT ruijsmarielle attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer AT verhoefsenno attitudetowardspreimplantationgeneticdiagnosisforhereditarycancer |