Cargando…

Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging

The objective of this study was to conduct an audit on QA aspects of treatment delivery by the verification of the treatment fields′ position on different days to document the efficiency of immobilization methods and reproducibility of treatment. A retrospective study was carried out on 60 patients,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murthy, K. Krishna, Al-Rahbi, Zakiya, Sivakumar, S. S., Davis, C. A., Ravichandran, R., El Ghamrawy, Kamal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893690
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41192
_version_ 1782173796297342976
author Murthy, K. Krishna
Al-Rahbi, Zakiya
Sivakumar, S. S.
Davis, C. A.
Ravichandran, R.
El Ghamrawy, Kamal
author_facet Murthy, K. Krishna
Al-Rahbi, Zakiya
Sivakumar, S. S.
Davis, C. A.
Ravichandran, R.
El Ghamrawy, Kamal
author_sort Murthy, K. Krishna
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to conduct an audit on QA aspects of treatment delivery by the verification of the treatment fields′ position on different days to document the efficiency of immobilization methods and reproducibility of treatment. A retrospective study was carried out on 60 patients, each 20 treated for head and neck, breast, and pelvic sites; and a total of 506 images obtained by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) were analyzed. The portal images acquired using the EPID systems attached to the Varian linear accelerators were superimposed on the reference images. The anatomy matching software (Varian portal Vision. 6.0) was used, and the displacements in two dimensions and rotation were noted for each treated field to study the patient setup errors. The percentages of mean deviations more than 3 mm in ‘lateral (X) and longitudinal (Y)’ directions were 17.5%, 11.25%, and 7.5% for breast, pelvis, and head and neck cases respectively. In all cases, the percentage of mean deviation with more than 5 mm error was 0.83%. The maximum average mean deviation in all the cases was 1.87. The average mean SD along X and Y directions in all the cases was less than 2.65. The results revealed that the ranges of setup errors are site specific and immobilization methods improve reproducibility. The observed variations were well within the limits. The study confirmed the accuracy and quality of treatments delivered to the patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2772027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27720272009-11-05 Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging Murthy, K. Krishna Al-Rahbi, Zakiya Sivakumar, S. S. Davis, C. A. Ravichandran, R. El Ghamrawy, Kamal J Med Phys Original Article The objective of this study was to conduct an audit on QA aspects of treatment delivery by the verification of the treatment fields′ position on different days to document the efficiency of immobilization methods and reproducibility of treatment. A retrospective study was carried out on 60 patients, each 20 treated for head and neck, breast, and pelvic sites; and a total of 506 images obtained by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) were analyzed. The portal images acquired using the EPID systems attached to the Varian linear accelerators were superimposed on the reference images. The anatomy matching software (Varian portal Vision. 6.0) was used, and the displacements in two dimensions and rotation were noted for each treated field to study the patient setup errors. The percentages of mean deviations more than 3 mm in ‘lateral (X) and longitudinal (Y)’ directions were 17.5%, 11.25%, and 7.5% for breast, pelvis, and head and neck cases respectively. In all cases, the percentage of mean deviation with more than 5 mm error was 0.83%. The maximum average mean deviation in all the cases was 1.87. The average mean SD along X and Y directions in all the cases was less than 2.65. The results revealed that the ranges of setup errors are site specific and immobilization methods improve reproducibility. The observed variations were well within the limits. The study confirmed the accuracy and quality of treatments delivered to the patients. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2772027/ /pubmed/19893690 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41192 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murthy, K. Krishna
Al-Rahbi, Zakiya
Sivakumar, S. S.
Davis, C. A.
Ravichandran, R.
El Ghamrawy, Kamal
Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title_full Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title_fullStr Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title_short Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
title_sort verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893690
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41192
work_keys_str_mv AT murthykkrishna verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging
AT alrahbizakiya verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging
AT sivakumarss verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging
AT davisca verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging
AT ravichandranr verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging
AT elghamrawykamal verificationofsetuperrorsinexternalbeamradiationtherapyusingelectronicportalimaging