Cargando…

Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning

The aim of this study was to evaluate the breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning and to correlate with breast parameters. Also, the number of slices required for treatment planning in breast cancer by tangential field technique has been assessed by comparing the treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhakar, R., Rath, G. K., Julka, P. K., Ganesh, T., Joshi, R. C., Manoharan, N.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893689
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41191
_version_ 1782173796772347904
author Prabhakar, R.
Rath, G. K.
Julka, P. K.
Ganesh, T.
Joshi, R. C.
Manoharan, N.
author_facet Prabhakar, R.
Rath, G. K.
Julka, P. K.
Ganesh, T.
Joshi, R. C.
Manoharan, N.
author_sort Prabhakar, R.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning and to correlate with breast parameters. Also, the number of slices required for treatment planning in breast cancer by tangential field technique has been assessed by comparing the treatment plans according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) 50 guidelines (1993) for single-slice, three-slice, and multi-slice (3D) planning . Sixty women who underwent isocentric tangential field breast radiotherapy were included in this study. The plans were optimized and analyzed with dose volume histograms. Sixty-three percent of the single-slice plans and 26.7% of the three-slice plans showed poor dose homogeneity as compared to the 3D plans. Dose inhomogeneity correlated better with breast volume (r(2) = 0.43) than the chest wall separation (r(2) = 0.37) and breast area product (r(2) = 0.36). Similarly, breast volume correlated better with breast area product (r(2) = 0.80) than with chest wall separation (r(2) = 0.56). Breast volume can be approximated to breast area product from the relation, breast volume = [(breast area product × 8.85) − 120.05]. The results of this study showed that most of the cases require 3D planning for breast cancer. It also showed that patients with large breast are prone to have more dose inhomogeneity with standard tangential field radiotherapy. In centers where 3D planning is not possible due to lack of facilities or workload, three slices–based planning can be performed to approximate the dosimetric advantage of 3D planning.
format Text
id pubmed-2772029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27720292009-11-05 Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning Prabhakar, R. Rath, G. K. Julka, P. K. Ganesh, T. Joshi, R. C. Manoharan, N. J Med Phys Original Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning and to correlate with breast parameters. Also, the number of slices required for treatment planning in breast cancer by tangential field technique has been assessed by comparing the treatment plans according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) 50 guidelines (1993) for single-slice, three-slice, and multi-slice (3D) planning . Sixty women who underwent isocentric tangential field breast radiotherapy were included in this study. The plans were optimized and analyzed with dose volume histograms. Sixty-three percent of the single-slice plans and 26.7% of the three-slice plans showed poor dose homogeneity as compared to the 3D plans. Dose inhomogeneity correlated better with breast volume (r(2) = 0.43) than the chest wall separation (r(2) = 0.37) and breast area product (r(2) = 0.36). Similarly, breast volume correlated better with breast area product (r(2) = 0.80) than with chest wall separation (r(2) = 0.56). Breast volume can be approximated to breast area product from the relation, breast volume = [(breast area product × 8.85) − 120.05]. The results of this study showed that most of the cases require 3D planning for breast cancer. It also showed that patients with large breast are prone to have more dose inhomogeneity with standard tangential field radiotherapy. In centers where 3D planning is not possible due to lack of facilities or workload, three slices–based planning can be performed to approximate the dosimetric advantage of 3D planning. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2772029/ /pubmed/19893689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41191 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prabhakar, R.
Rath, G. K.
Julka, P. K.
Ganesh, T.
Joshi, R. C.
Manoharan, N.
Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title_fullStr Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title_short Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning
title_sort breast dose heterogeneity in ct-based radiotherapy treatment planning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893689
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.41191
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhakarr breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT rathgk breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT julkapk breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT ganesht breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT joshirc breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT manoharann breastdoseheterogeneityinctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanning