Cargando…

Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)

BACKGROUND-: The aim of the study was to develop quality indicators that can be used for quality assessment of registries of occupational diseases in relation to preventive policy on a national level. The research questions were: 1. Which indicators determine the quality of national registries of oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spreeuwers, Dick, de Boer, Angela GEM, Verbeek, Jos HAM, van Dijk, Frank JH
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-194
_version_ 1782173854615994368
author Spreeuwers, Dick
de Boer, Angela GEM
Verbeek, Jos HAM
van Dijk, Frank JH
author_facet Spreeuwers, Dick
de Boer, Angela GEM
Verbeek, Jos HAM
van Dijk, Frank JH
author_sort Spreeuwers, Dick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND-: The aim of the study was to develop quality indicators that can be used for quality assessment of registries of occupational diseases in relation to preventive policy on a national level. The research questions were: 1. Which indicators determine the quality of national registries of occupational diseases with respect to their ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy? 2. What are the criteria that can distinguish low quality from high quality? METHODS-: First, we performed a literature search to assess which output of registries can be considered appropriate for preventive policy and to develop a set of preliminary indicators and criteria. Second, final indicators and criteria were assessed and their content validity was tested in a Delphi study, for which experts from the 25 EU Member States were invited. RESULTS-: The literature search revealed two different types of information output to be appropriate for preventive policy: monitor and alert information. For the evaluation of the quality of the monitor and alert function we developed ten indicators and criteria. Sixteen of the twenty-five experts responded in the first round of the Delphi study, and eleven in the second round. Based on their comments, we assessed the final nine indicators: the completeness of the notification form, coverage of registration, guidelines or criteria for notification, education and training of reporting physicians, completeness of registration, statistical methods used, investigation of special cases, presentation of monitor information, and presentation of alert information. Except for the indicator "coverage of registration" for the alert function, all the indicators met the preset requirements of content validity. CONCLUSION-: We have developed quality indicators and criteria to evaluate registries for occupational diseases on the ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy on a national level. Together, these indicators form a tool which can be used for quality improvement of registries of occupational diseases.
format Text
id pubmed-2773237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27732372009-11-05 Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT) Spreeuwers, Dick de Boer, Angela GEM Verbeek, Jos HAM van Dijk, Frank JH BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND-: The aim of the study was to develop quality indicators that can be used for quality assessment of registries of occupational diseases in relation to preventive policy on a national level. The research questions were: 1. Which indicators determine the quality of national registries of occupational diseases with respect to their ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy? 2. What are the criteria that can distinguish low quality from high quality? METHODS-: First, we performed a literature search to assess which output of registries can be considered appropriate for preventive policy and to develop a set of preliminary indicators and criteria. Second, final indicators and criteria were assessed and their content validity was tested in a Delphi study, for which experts from the 25 EU Member States were invited. RESULTS-: The literature search revealed two different types of information output to be appropriate for preventive policy: monitor and alert information. For the evaluation of the quality of the monitor and alert function we developed ten indicators and criteria. Sixteen of the twenty-five experts responded in the first round of the Delphi study, and eleven in the second round. Based on their comments, we assessed the final nine indicators: the completeness of the notification form, coverage of registration, guidelines or criteria for notification, education and training of reporting physicians, completeness of registration, statistical methods used, investigation of special cases, presentation of monitor information, and presentation of alert information. Except for the indicator "coverage of registration" for the alert function, all the indicators met the preset requirements of content validity. CONCLUSION-: We have developed quality indicators and criteria to evaluate registries for occupational diseases on the ability to provide appropriate information for preventive policy on a national level. Together, these indicators form a tool which can be used for quality improvement of registries of occupational diseases. BioMed Central 2009-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2773237/ /pubmed/19852775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-194 Text en Copyright © 2009 Spreeuwers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spreeuwers, Dick
de Boer, Angela GEM
Verbeek, Jos HAM
van Dijk, Frank JH
Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title_full Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title_fullStr Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title_short Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
title_sort characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (odit)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-194
work_keys_str_mv AT spreeuwersdick characteristicsofnationalregistriesforoccupationaldiseasesinternationaldevelopmentandvalidationofanaudittoolodit
AT deboerangelagem characteristicsofnationalregistriesforoccupationaldiseasesinternationaldevelopmentandvalidationofanaudittoolodit
AT verbeekjosham characteristicsofnationalregistriesforoccupationaldiseasesinternationaldevelopmentandvalidationofanaudittoolodit
AT vandijkfrankjh characteristicsofnationalregistriesforoccupationaldiseasesinternationaldevelopmentandvalidationofanaudittoolodit