Cargando…

Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Malaria carries high case fatality among children with sickle cell anaemia. In Uganda, chloroquine is used for prophylaxis in these children despite unacceptably high levels of resistance. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has shown great potential f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakibuuka, Victoria, Ndeezi, Grace, Nakiboneka, Deborah, Ndugwa, Christopher M, Tumwine, James K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2774335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-237
_version_ 1782173932514705408
author Nakibuuka, Victoria
Ndeezi, Grace
Nakiboneka, Deborah
Ndugwa, Christopher M
Tumwine, James K
author_facet Nakibuuka, Victoria
Ndeezi, Grace
Nakiboneka, Deborah
Ndugwa, Christopher M
Tumwine, James K
author_sort Nakibuuka, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria carries high case fatality among children with sickle cell anaemia. In Uganda, chloroquine is used for prophylaxis in these children despite unacceptably high levels of resistance. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has shown great potential for reducing prevalence of malaria and anaemia among pregnant women and infants. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of monthly SP presumptive treatment, versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children attending the Sickle Cell Clinic, Mulago Hospital. METHODS: Two hundred and forty two children with sickle cell anaemia were randomized to presumptive treatment with SP or weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis. Active detection of malaria was made at each weekly visit to the clinic over one month. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children with one malaria episode at one month follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included malaria-related admissions and adverse effects of the drugs. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (114/122) of the children in the chloroquine group and 94% (113/120) in the SP group completed one month follow up. SP reduced prevalence of malaria by 50% compared to chloroquine [OR = 0.50, (95% CI 0.26-0.97)]; p = 0.042. Six percent (7/122) of the children receiving weekly chloroquine had malaria related admissions compared to 2.5% (3/120) on presumptive treatment with SP. No serious drug effects were reported in both treatment groups CONCLUSION: Presumptive treatment with SP was more efficacious than weekly chloroquine in reducing prevalence of malaria in children with sickle cell anaemia. Continued use of chloroquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda does not seem to be justified. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCTOO124267
format Text
id pubmed-2774335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27743352009-11-07 Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial Nakibuuka, Victoria Ndeezi, Grace Nakiboneka, Deborah Ndugwa, Christopher M Tumwine, James K Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria carries high case fatality among children with sickle cell anaemia. In Uganda, chloroquine is used for prophylaxis in these children despite unacceptably high levels of resistance. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has shown great potential for reducing prevalence of malaria and anaemia among pregnant women and infants. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of monthly SP presumptive treatment, versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children attending the Sickle Cell Clinic, Mulago Hospital. METHODS: Two hundred and forty two children with sickle cell anaemia were randomized to presumptive treatment with SP or weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis. Active detection of malaria was made at each weekly visit to the clinic over one month. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children with one malaria episode at one month follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included malaria-related admissions and adverse effects of the drugs. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (114/122) of the children in the chloroquine group and 94% (113/120) in the SP group completed one month follow up. SP reduced prevalence of malaria by 50% compared to chloroquine [OR = 0.50, (95% CI 0.26-0.97)]; p = 0.042. Six percent (7/122) of the children receiving weekly chloroquine had malaria related admissions compared to 2.5% (3/120) on presumptive treatment with SP. No serious drug effects were reported in both treatment groups CONCLUSION: Presumptive treatment with SP was more efficacious than weekly chloroquine in reducing prevalence of malaria in children with sickle cell anaemia. Continued use of chloroquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda does not seem to be justified. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCTOO124267 BioMed Central 2009-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2774335/ /pubmed/19852829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-237 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nakibuuka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nakibuuka, Victoria
Ndeezi, Grace
Nakiboneka, Deborah
Ndugwa, Christopher M
Tumwine, James K
Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in uganda: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2774335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19852829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-237
work_keys_str_mv AT nakibuukavictoria presumptivetreatmentwithsulphadoxinepyrimethamineversusweeklychloroquineformalariaprophylaxisinchildrenwithsicklecellanaemiainugandaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ndeezigrace presumptivetreatmentwithsulphadoxinepyrimethamineversusweeklychloroquineformalariaprophylaxisinchildrenwithsicklecellanaemiainugandaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakibonekadeborah presumptivetreatmentwithsulphadoxinepyrimethamineversusweeklychloroquineformalariaprophylaxisinchildrenwithsicklecellanaemiainugandaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ndugwachristopherm presumptivetreatmentwithsulphadoxinepyrimethamineversusweeklychloroquineformalariaprophylaxisinchildrenwithsicklecellanaemiainugandaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tumwinejamesk presumptivetreatmentwithsulphadoxinepyrimethamineversusweeklychloroquineformalariaprophylaxisinchildrenwithsicklecellanaemiainugandaarandomizedcontrolledtrial