Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, J-S, Jang, I-K, Kim, T H, Takano, M, Kume, T, Hur, N W, Ko, Y-G, Choi, D, Hong, M-K, Jang, Y
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19535352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. SETTING: Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) μm vs 85.5 (53.3) μm, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months’ follow-up.