Cargando…
Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19535352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759 |
_version_ | 1782173989118935040 |
---|---|
author | Kim, J-S Jang, I-K Kim, J-S Kim, T H Takano, M Kume, T Hur, N W Ko, Y-G Choi, D Hong, M-K Jang, Y |
author_facet | Kim, J-S Jang, I-K Kim, J-S Kim, T H Takano, M Kume, T Hur, N W Ko, Y-G Choi, D Hong, M-K Jang, Y |
author_sort | Kim, J-S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. SETTING: Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) μm vs 85.5 (53.3) μm, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months’ follow-up. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2775122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27751222009-12-02 Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents Kim, J-S Jang, I-K Kim, J-S Kim, T H Takano, M Kume, T Hur, N W Ko, Y-G Choi, D Hong, M-K Jang, Y Heart Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. SETTING: Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) μm vs 85.5 (53.3) μm, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months’ follow-up. BMJ Group 2009-12-01 2009-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2775122/ /pubmed/19535352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759 Text en © Kim et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kim, J-S Jang, I-K Kim, J-S Kim, T H Takano, M Kume, T Hur, N W Ko, Y-G Choi, D Hong, M-K Jang, Y Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title | Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title_full | Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title_fullStr | Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title_short | Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
title_sort | optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19535352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjs opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT jangik opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT kimjs opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT kimth opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT takanom opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT kumet opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT hurnw opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT koyg opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT choid opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT hongmk opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents AT jangy opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents |