Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, J-S, Jang, I-K, Kim, T H, Takano, M, Kume, T, Hur, N W, Ko, Y-G, Choi, D, Hong, M-K, Jang, Y
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19535352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759
_version_ 1782173989118935040
author Kim, J-S
Jang, I-K
Kim, J-S
Kim, T H
Takano, M
Kume, T
Hur, N W
Ko, Y-G
Choi, D
Hong, M-K
Jang, Y
author_facet Kim, J-S
Jang, I-K
Kim, J-S
Kim, T H
Takano, M
Kume, T
Hur, N W
Ko, Y-G
Choi, D
Hong, M-K
Jang, Y
author_sort Kim, J-S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. SETTING: Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) μm vs 85.5 (53.3) μm, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months’ follow-up.
format Text
id pubmed-2775122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27751222009-12-02 Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents Kim, J-S Jang, I-K Kim, J-S Kim, T H Takano, M Kume, T Hur, N W Ko, Y-G Choi, D Hong, M-K Jang, Y Heart Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. SETTING: Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) μm vs 85.5 (53.3) μm, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months’ follow-up. BMJ Group 2009-12-01 2009-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2775122/ /pubmed/19535352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759 Text en © Kim et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kim, J-S
Jang, I-K
Kim, J-S
Kim, T H
Takano, M
Kume, T
Hur, N W
Ko, Y-G
Choi, D
Hong, M-K
Jang, Y
Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title_full Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title_fullStr Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title_full_unstemmed Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title_short Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
title_sort optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19535352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.167759
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjs opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT jangik opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT kimjs opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT kimth opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT takanom opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT kumet opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT hurnw opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT koyg opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT choid opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT hongmk opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents
AT jangy opticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofzotarolimuselutingstentsat9monthfollowupcomparisonwithsirolimuselutingstents