Cargando…

Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink

BACKGROUND: It is well known that facial expressions represent important social cues. In humans expressing facial emotion, fear may be configured to maximize sensory exposure (e.g., increases visual input) whereas disgust can reduce sensory exposure (e.g., decreases visual input). To investigate whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vermeulen, Nicolas, Godefroid, Jimmy, Mermillod, Martial
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007924
_version_ 1782174003335528448
author Vermeulen, Nicolas
Godefroid, Jimmy
Mermillod, Martial
author_facet Vermeulen, Nicolas
Godefroid, Jimmy
Mermillod, Martial
author_sort Vermeulen, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well known that facial expressions represent important social cues. In humans expressing facial emotion, fear may be configured to maximize sensory exposure (e.g., increases visual input) whereas disgust can reduce sensory exposure (e.g., decreases visual input). To investigate whether such effects also extend to the attentional system, we used the “attentional blink” (AB) paradigm. Many studies have documented that the second target (T2) of a pair is typically missed when presented within a time window of about 200–500 ms from the first to-be-detected target (T1; i.e., the AB effect). It has recently been proposed that the AB effect depends on the efficiency of a gating system which facilitates the entrance of relevant input into working memory, while inhibiting irrelevant input. Following the inhibitory response on post T1 distractors, prolonged inhibition of the subsequent T2 is observed. In the present study, we hypothesized that processing facial expressions of emotion would influence this attentional gating. Fearful faces would increase but disgust faces would decrease inhibition of the second target. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We showed that processing fearful versus disgust faces has different effects on these attentional processes. We found that processing fear faces impaired the detection of T2 to a greater extent than did the processing disgust faces. This finding implies emotion-specific modulation of attention. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the recent literature on attention, our finding suggests that processing fear-related stimuli exerts greater inhibitory responses on distractors relative to processing disgust-related stimuli. This finding is of particular interest for researchers examining the influence of emotional processing on attention and memory in both clinical and normal populations. For example, future research could extend upon the current study to examine whether inhibitory processes invoked by fear-related stimuli may be the mechanism underlying the enhanced learning of fear-related stimuli.
format Text
id pubmed-2775630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27756302009-11-24 Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink Vermeulen, Nicolas Godefroid, Jimmy Mermillod, Martial PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: It is well known that facial expressions represent important social cues. In humans expressing facial emotion, fear may be configured to maximize sensory exposure (e.g., increases visual input) whereas disgust can reduce sensory exposure (e.g., decreases visual input). To investigate whether such effects also extend to the attentional system, we used the “attentional blink” (AB) paradigm. Many studies have documented that the second target (T2) of a pair is typically missed when presented within a time window of about 200–500 ms from the first to-be-detected target (T1; i.e., the AB effect). It has recently been proposed that the AB effect depends on the efficiency of a gating system which facilitates the entrance of relevant input into working memory, while inhibiting irrelevant input. Following the inhibitory response on post T1 distractors, prolonged inhibition of the subsequent T2 is observed. In the present study, we hypothesized that processing facial expressions of emotion would influence this attentional gating. Fearful faces would increase but disgust faces would decrease inhibition of the second target. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We showed that processing fearful versus disgust faces has different effects on these attentional processes. We found that processing fear faces impaired the detection of T2 to a greater extent than did the processing disgust faces. This finding implies emotion-specific modulation of attention. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the recent literature on attention, our finding suggests that processing fear-related stimuli exerts greater inhibitory responses on distractors relative to processing disgust-related stimuli. This finding is of particular interest for researchers examining the influence of emotional processing on attention and memory in both clinical and normal populations. For example, future research could extend upon the current study to examine whether inhibitory processes invoked by fear-related stimuli may be the mechanism underlying the enhanced learning of fear-related stimuli. Public Library of Science 2009-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2775630/ /pubmed/19936235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007924 Text en Vermeulen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vermeulen, Nicolas
Godefroid, Jimmy
Mermillod, Martial
Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title_full Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title_fullStr Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title_short Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink
title_sort emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007924
work_keys_str_mv AT vermeulennicolas emotionalmodulationofattentionfearincreasesbutdisgustreducestheattentionalblink
AT godefroidjimmy emotionalmodulationofattentionfearincreasesbutdisgustreducestheattentionalblink
AT mermillodmartial emotionalmodulationofattentionfearincreasesbutdisgustreducestheattentionalblink