Cargando…
Debunking the claim that abstinence is usually healthier for smokers than switching to a low-risk alternative, and other observations about anti-tobacco-harm-reduction arguments
Nicotine is so desirable to many people that when they are given only the options of consuming nicotine by smoking, with its high health costs, and not consuming nicotine at all, many opt for the former. Few smokers realize that there is a third choice: non-combustion nicotine sources, such as smoke...
Autor principal: | Phillips, Carl V |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19887003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-6-29 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments
por: Kahane, Guy
Publicado: (2011) -
Effect of Smoking Abstinence and Reduction in Asthmatic Smokers Switching to Electronic Cigarettes: Evidence for Harm Reversal
por: Polosa, Riccardo, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Reduction in Exposure to Selected Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents Approaching Those Observed Upon Smoking Abstinence in Smokers Switching to the Menthol Tobacco Heating System 2.2 for 3 Months (Part 1)
por: Haziza, Christelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Claims on Ready-to-Eat Cereals: Are Those With Claims Healthier?
por: Parra-Murillo, María, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A critical appraisal of the harm reduction argument for heat-not-burn tobacco products
por: Paumgartten, Francisco J.R.
Publicado: (2018)