Cargando…

Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

A number of different interferon-γ ELISpot protocols are in use in laboratories studying antigen-specific immune responses. It is therefore unclear how results from different assays compare, and what factors most significantly influence assay outcome. One such difference is that some laboratories us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Steven G., Joosten, Simone A., Verscheure, Virginie, Pathan, Ansar A., McShane, Helen, Ottenhoff, Tom H. M., Dockrell, Hazel M., Mascart, Françoise
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007972
_version_ 1782174085690687488
author Smith, Steven G.
Joosten, Simone A.
Verscheure, Virginie
Pathan, Ansar A.
McShane, Helen
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
Mascart, Françoise
author_facet Smith, Steven G.
Joosten, Simone A.
Verscheure, Virginie
Pathan, Ansar A.
McShane, Helen
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
Mascart, Françoise
author_sort Smith, Steven G.
collection PubMed
description A number of different interferon-γ ELISpot protocols are in use in laboratories studying antigen-specific immune responses. It is therefore unclear how results from different assays compare, and what factors most significantly influence assay outcome. One such difference is that some laboratories use a short in vitro stimulation period of cells before they are transferred to the ELISpot plate; this is commonly done in the case of frozen cells, in order to enhance assay sensitivity. Other differences that may be significant include antibody coating of plates, the use of media with or without serum, the serum source and the number of cells added to the wells. The aim of this paper was to identify which components of the different ELISpot protocols influenced assay sensitivity and inter-laboratory variation. Four laboratories provided protocols for quantifying numbers of interferon-γ spot forming cells in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis derived antigens. The differences in the protocols were compared directly. We found that several sources of variation in assay protocols can be eliminated, for example by avoiding serum supplementation and using AIM-V serum free medium. In addition, the number of cells added to ELISpot wells should also be standardised. Importantly, delays in peripheral blood mononuclear cell processing before stimulation had a marked effect on the number of detectable spot forming cells; processing delay thus should be minimised as well as standardised. Finally, a pre-stimulation culture period improved the sensitivity of the assay, however this effect may be both antigen and donor dependent. In conclusion, small differences in ELISpot protocols in routine use can affect the results obtained and care should be given to conditions selected for use in a given study. A pre-stimulation step may improve the sensitivity of the assay, particularly when cells have been previously frozen.
format Text
id pubmed-2776358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27763582009-12-03 Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis Smith, Steven G. Joosten, Simone A. Verscheure, Virginie Pathan, Ansar A. McShane, Helen Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. Dockrell, Hazel M. Mascart, Françoise PLoS One Research Article A number of different interferon-γ ELISpot protocols are in use in laboratories studying antigen-specific immune responses. It is therefore unclear how results from different assays compare, and what factors most significantly influence assay outcome. One such difference is that some laboratories use a short in vitro stimulation period of cells before they are transferred to the ELISpot plate; this is commonly done in the case of frozen cells, in order to enhance assay sensitivity. Other differences that may be significant include antibody coating of plates, the use of media with or without serum, the serum source and the number of cells added to the wells. The aim of this paper was to identify which components of the different ELISpot protocols influenced assay sensitivity and inter-laboratory variation. Four laboratories provided protocols for quantifying numbers of interferon-γ spot forming cells in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis derived antigens. The differences in the protocols were compared directly. We found that several sources of variation in assay protocols can be eliminated, for example by avoiding serum supplementation and using AIM-V serum free medium. In addition, the number of cells added to ELISpot wells should also be standardised. Importantly, delays in peripheral blood mononuclear cell processing before stimulation had a marked effect on the number of detectable spot forming cells; processing delay thus should be minimised as well as standardised. Finally, a pre-stimulation culture period improved the sensitivity of the assay, however this effect may be both antigen and donor dependent. In conclusion, small differences in ELISpot protocols in routine use can affect the results obtained and care should be given to conditions selected for use in a given study. A pre-stimulation step may improve the sensitivity of the assay, particularly when cells have been previously frozen. Public Library of Science 2009-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2776358/ /pubmed/19956718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007972 Text en Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Steven G.
Joosten, Simone A.
Verscheure, Virginie
Pathan, Ansar A.
McShane, Helen
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
Mascart, Françoise
Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_fullStr Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_short Identification of Major Factors Influencing ELISpot-Based Monitoring of Cellular Responses to Antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_sort identification of major factors influencing elispot-based monitoring of cellular responses to antigens from mycobacterium tuberculosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007972
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsteveng identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT joostensimonea identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT verscheurevirginie identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT pathanansara identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT mcshanehelen identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT ottenhofftomhm identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT dockrellhazelm identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT mascartfrancoise identificationofmajorfactorsinfluencingelispotbasedmonitoringofcellularresponsestoantigensfrommycobacteriumtuberculosis