Cargando…

Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial

OBJECTIVES: Procalcitonin (PCT) is an accurate marker for differentiating bacterial infection from non-infective causes of inflammation or viral infection. However, there is only one study in children which tested procalcitonin as a diagnostic aid in skeletal infections. With this study we sought to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faesch, Sabine, Cojocaru, Bogdan, Hennequin, Carole, Pannier, Stéphanie, Glorion, Christophe, Lacour, Bernard, Chéron, Gérard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-35-33
_version_ 1782174148791894016
author Faesch, Sabine
Cojocaru, Bogdan
Hennequin, Carole
Pannier, Stéphanie
Glorion, Christophe
Lacour, Bernard
Chéron, Gérard
author_facet Faesch, Sabine
Cojocaru, Bogdan
Hennequin, Carole
Pannier, Stéphanie
Glorion, Christophe
Lacour, Bernard
Chéron, Gérard
author_sort Faesch, Sabine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Procalcitonin (PCT) is an accurate marker for differentiating bacterial infection from non-infective causes of inflammation or viral infection. However, there is only one study in children which tested procalcitonin as a diagnostic aid in skeletal infections. With this study we sought to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of procalcitonin for identifying bone and joint infection in children evaluated in the emergency department for non traumatic decreased active motion of a skeletal segment. METHODS: Patients aged 1 month to 14 years were prospectively included in the emergency department when suspected for osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. Procalcitonin levels, C reactiv protein, white blood cell count were measured and bacteriological samples were collected before initiation of antibiotic treatment. Patients were assigned to 3 groups according to the degree of suspected infection: group 1 confirmed infection, group 2 presumed infection and group 3 non infected patients. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty nine patients were included (118 girls and 221 boys). Group 1 comprised 8 patients (2 had PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml). Two had osteomyelitis and 6 septic arthritis. Forty children were incuded in group 2 (4 had PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml). Eighteen had presumed osteomyelitis and 22 presumed septic arthritis. Group 3 comprised 291 children (9 PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml) who recovered without antibiotic treatment. The specificity of the PCT as a marker of bacterial infection (comparing Group 1 and Group 3) was 96.9% [95% CI, 94.2-98.6], the sensitivity 25% [95% CI, 3.2-65.1], the positive predictive value (PPV) 18.2% [95% CI, 2.3-51.8] and the negative predictive value (NPV) 97.9% [95% CI, 95.5-99.2]. CONCLUSION: PCT is not a good screening test for identifying skeletal infection in children. Larger studies are needed to evaluate still more the place of PCT measurements in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis.
format Text
id pubmed-2777174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27771742009-11-15 Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial Faesch, Sabine Cojocaru, Bogdan Hennequin, Carole Pannier, Stéphanie Glorion, Christophe Lacour, Bernard Chéron, Gérard Ital J Pediatr Review OBJECTIVES: Procalcitonin (PCT) is an accurate marker for differentiating bacterial infection from non-infective causes of inflammation or viral infection. However, there is only one study in children which tested procalcitonin as a diagnostic aid in skeletal infections. With this study we sought to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of procalcitonin for identifying bone and joint infection in children evaluated in the emergency department for non traumatic decreased active motion of a skeletal segment. METHODS: Patients aged 1 month to 14 years were prospectively included in the emergency department when suspected for osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. Procalcitonin levels, C reactiv protein, white blood cell count were measured and bacteriological samples were collected before initiation of antibiotic treatment. Patients were assigned to 3 groups according to the degree of suspected infection: group 1 confirmed infection, group 2 presumed infection and group 3 non infected patients. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty nine patients were included (118 girls and 221 boys). Group 1 comprised 8 patients (2 had PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml). Two had osteomyelitis and 6 septic arthritis. Forty children were incuded in group 2 (4 had PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml). Eighteen had presumed osteomyelitis and 22 presumed septic arthritis. Group 3 comprised 291 children (9 PCT levels > 0.5 ng/ml) who recovered without antibiotic treatment. The specificity of the PCT as a marker of bacterial infection (comparing Group 1 and Group 3) was 96.9% [95% CI, 94.2-98.6], the sensitivity 25% [95% CI, 3.2-65.1], the positive predictive value (PPV) 18.2% [95% CI, 2.3-51.8] and the negative predictive value (NPV) 97.9% [95% CI, 95.5-99.2]. CONCLUSION: PCT is not a good screening test for identifying skeletal infection in children. Larger studies are needed to evaluate still more the place of PCT measurements in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. BioMed Central 2009-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2777174/ /pubmed/19889215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-35-33 Text en Copyright © 2009 Faesch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Faesch, Sabine
Cojocaru, Bogdan
Hennequin, Carole
Pannier, Stéphanie
Glorion, Christophe
Lacour, Bernard
Chéron, Gérard
Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title_full Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title_fullStr Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title_full_unstemmed Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title_short Can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? A prospective trial
title_sort can procalcitonin measurement help the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis? a prospective trial
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-35-33
work_keys_str_mv AT faeschsabine canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT cojocarubogdan canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT hennequincarole canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT pannierstephanie canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT glorionchristophe canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT lacourbernard canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial
AT cherongerard canprocalcitoninmeasurementhelpthediagnosisofosteomyelitisandsepticarthritisaprospectivetrial