Cargando…

A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol

BACKGROUND: Corifollitropin alfa, a fusion protein lacking LH activity, has a longer elimination half-life and extended time to peak levels than recombinant FSH (rFSH). A single injection of corifollitropin alfa may replace seven daily gonadotrophin injections during the first week of ovarian stimul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devroey, P., Boostanfar, R., Koper, N.P., Mannaerts, B.M.J.L., IJzerman-Boon, P.C., Fauser, B.C.J.M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19684043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep291
_version_ 1782174197731033088
author Devroey, P.
Boostanfar, R.
Koper, N.P.
Mannaerts, B.M.J.L.
IJzerman-Boon, P.C.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
author_facet Devroey, P.
Boostanfar, R.
Koper, N.P.
Mannaerts, B.M.J.L.
IJzerman-Boon, P.C.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
author_sort Devroey, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corifollitropin alfa, a fusion protein lacking LH activity, has a longer elimination half-life and extended time to peak levels than recombinant FSH (rFSH). A single injection of corifollitropin alfa may replace seven daily gonadotrophin injections during the first week of ovarian stimulation. METHODS: In this large, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial the ongoing pregnancy rates were assessed after one injection of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa during the first week of stimulation and compared with daily injections of 200 IU rFSH using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1506 treated patients with mean age of 31.5 years and body weight of 68.6 kg. Ongoing pregnancy rates of 38.9% for the corifollitropin alfa group and 38.1% for rFSH were achieved, with an estimated non-significant difference of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): −3.9; 5.7] in favor of corifollitropin alfa. Stratified analyses of pregnancy rates confirmed robustness of this primary outcome by showing similar results regardless of IVF or ICSI, or number of embryos transferred. A slightly higher follicular response with corifollitropin alfa resulted in a higher number of cumulus–oocyte-complexes compared with rFSH [estimated difference 1.2 (95% CI: 0.5; 1.9)], whereas median duration of stimulation was equal (9 days) and incidence of (moderate/severe) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same (4.1 and 2.7%, respectively P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Corifollitropin alfa is a novel and effective treatment option for potential normal responder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment for IVF resulting in a high ongoing pregnancy rate, equal to that achieved with daily rFSH. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NTC00696800.
format Text
id pubmed-2777786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27777862009-11-17 A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol Devroey, P. Boostanfar, R. Koper, N.P. Mannaerts, B.M.J.L. IJzerman-Boon, P.C. Fauser, B.C.J.M. Hum Reprod Original Articles BACKGROUND: Corifollitropin alfa, a fusion protein lacking LH activity, has a longer elimination half-life and extended time to peak levels than recombinant FSH (rFSH). A single injection of corifollitropin alfa may replace seven daily gonadotrophin injections during the first week of ovarian stimulation. METHODS: In this large, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial the ongoing pregnancy rates were assessed after one injection of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa during the first week of stimulation and compared with daily injections of 200 IU rFSH using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1506 treated patients with mean age of 31.5 years and body weight of 68.6 kg. Ongoing pregnancy rates of 38.9% for the corifollitropin alfa group and 38.1% for rFSH were achieved, with an estimated non-significant difference of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): −3.9; 5.7] in favor of corifollitropin alfa. Stratified analyses of pregnancy rates confirmed robustness of this primary outcome by showing similar results regardless of IVF or ICSI, or number of embryos transferred. A slightly higher follicular response with corifollitropin alfa resulted in a higher number of cumulus–oocyte-complexes compared with rFSH [estimated difference 1.2 (95% CI: 0.5; 1.9)], whereas median duration of stimulation was equal (9 days) and incidence of (moderate/severe) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same (4.1 and 2.7%, respectively P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Corifollitropin alfa is a novel and effective treatment option for potential normal responder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment for IVF resulting in a high ongoing pregnancy rate, equal to that achieved with daily rFSH. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NTC00696800. Oxford University Press 2009-12 2009-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2777786/ /pubmed/19684043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep291 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Devroey, P.
Boostanfar, R.
Koper, N.P.
Mannaerts, B.M.J.L.
IJzerman-Boon, P.C.
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title_full A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title_fullStr A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title_full_unstemmed A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title_short A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
title_sort double-blind, non-inferiority rct comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant fsh during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a gnrh antagonist protocol
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19684043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep291
work_keys_str_mv AT devroeyp adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT boostanfarr adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT kopernp adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT mannaertsbmjl adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT ijzermanboonpc adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT fauserbcjm adoubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT devroeyp doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT boostanfarr doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT kopernp doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT mannaertsbmjl doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT ijzermanboonpc doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol
AT fauserbcjm doubleblindnoninferiorityrctcomparingcorifollitropinalfaandrecombinantfshduringthefirstsevendaysofovarianstimulationusingagnrhantagonistprotocol