Cargando…
A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368 |
_version_ | 1782174209799094272 |
---|---|
author | Drelie Gelasca, Elisa Obara, Boguslaw Fedorov, Dmitry Kvilekval, Kristian Manjunath, BS |
author_facet | Drelie Gelasca, Elisa Obara, Boguslaw Fedorov, Dmitry Kvilekval, Kristian Manjunath, BS |
author_sort | Drelie Gelasca, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end-user to choose from a wide range of segmentation methods available in the literature for a particular bioimaging problem. No single algorithm is likely to be equally effective on diverse set of images and each method has its own strengths and limitations. We hope that our benchmark resource would be of considerable help to both the bioimaging researchers looking for novel image processing methods and image processing researchers exploring application of their methods to biology. RESULTS: Our benchmark consists of different classes of images and ground truth data, ranging in scale from subcellular, cellular to tissue level, each of which pose their own set of challenges to image analysis. The associated ground truth data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods, to improve methods and to compare results. Standard evaluation methods and some analysis tools are integrated into a database framework that is available online at . CONCLUSION: This online benchmark will facilitate integration and comparison of image analysis methods for bioimages. While the primary focus is on biological images, we believe that the dataset and infrastructure will be of interest to researchers and developers working with biological image analysis, image segmentation and object tracking in general. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2777895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27778952009-11-17 A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods Drelie Gelasca, Elisa Obara, Boguslaw Fedorov, Dmitry Kvilekval, Kristian Manjunath, BS BMC Bioinformatics Database BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end-user to choose from a wide range of segmentation methods available in the literature for a particular bioimaging problem. No single algorithm is likely to be equally effective on diverse set of images and each method has its own strengths and limitations. We hope that our benchmark resource would be of considerable help to both the bioimaging researchers looking for novel image processing methods and image processing researchers exploring application of their methods to biology. RESULTS: Our benchmark consists of different classes of images and ground truth data, ranging in scale from subcellular, cellular to tissue level, each of which pose their own set of challenges to image analysis. The associated ground truth data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods, to improve methods and to compare results. Standard evaluation methods and some analysis tools are integrated into a database framework that is available online at . CONCLUSION: This online benchmark will facilitate integration and comparison of image analysis methods for bioimages. While the primary focus is on biological images, we believe that the dataset and infrastructure will be of interest to researchers and developers working with biological image analysis, image segmentation and object tracking in general. BioMed Central 2009-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2777895/ /pubmed/19878606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368 Text en Copyright © 2009 Drelie Gelasca et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Database Drelie Gelasca, Elisa Obara, Boguslaw Fedorov, Dmitry Kvilekval, Kristian Manjunath, BS A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title | A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title_full | A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title_fullStr | A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title_short | A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
title_sort | biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods |
topic | Database |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dreliegelascaelisa abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT obaraboguslaw abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT fedorovdmitry abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT kvilekvalkristian abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT manjunathbs abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT dreliegelascaelisa biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT obaraboguslaw biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT fedorovdmitry biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT kvilekvalkristian biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods AT manjunathbs biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods |