Cargando…

A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods

BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drelie Gelasca, Elisa, Obara, Boguslaw, Fedorov, Dmitry, Kvilekval, Kristian, Manjunath, BS
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368
_version_ 1782174209799094272
author Drelie Gelasca, Elisa
Obara, Boguslaw
Fedorov, Dmitry
Kvilekval, Kristian
Manjunath, BS
author_facet Drelie Gelasca, Elisa
Obara, Boguslaw
Fedorov, Dmitry
Kvilekval, Kristian
Manjunath, BS
author_sort Drelie Gelasca, Elisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end-user to choose from a wide range of segmentation methods available in the literature for a particular bioimaging problem. No single algorithm is likely to be equally effective on diverse set of images and each method has its own strengths and limitations. We hope that our benchmark resource would be of considerable help to both the bioimaging researchers looking for novel image processing methods and image processing researchers exploring application of their methods to biology. RESULTS: Our benchmark consists of different classes of images and ground truth data, ranging in scale from subcellular, cellular to tissue level, each of which pose their own set of challenges to image analysis. The associated ground truth data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods, to improve methods and to compare results. Standard evaluation methods and some analysis tools are integrated into a database framework that is available online at . CONCLUSION: This online benchmark will facilitate integration and comparison of image analysis methods for bioimages. While the primary focus is on biological images, we believe that the dataset and infrastructure will be of interest to researchers and developers working with biological image analysis, image segmentation and object tracking in general.
format Text
id pubmed-2777895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27778952009-11-17 A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods Drelie Gelasca, Elisa Obara, Boguslaw Fedorov, Dmitry Kvilekval, Kristian Manjunath, BS BMC Bioinformatics Database BACKGROUND: We present a biosegmentation benchmark that includes infrastructure, datasets with associated ground truth, and validation methods for biological image analysis. The primary motivation for creating this resource comes from the fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for an end-user to choose from a wide range of segmentation methods available in the literature for a particular bioimaging problem. No single algorithm is likely to be equally effective on diverse set of images and each method has its own strengths and limitations. We hope that our benchmark resource would be of considerable help to both the bioimaging researchers looking for novel image processing methods and image processing researchers exploring application of their methods to biology. RESULTS: Our benchmark consists of different classes of images and ground truth data, ranging in scale from subcellular, cellular to tissue level, each of which pose their own set of challenges to image analysis. The associated ground truth data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods, to improve methods and to compare results. Standard evaluation methods and some analysis tools are integrated into a database framework that is available online at . CONCLUSION: This online benchmark will facilitate integration and comparison of image analysis methods for bioimages. While the primary focus is on biological images, we believe that the dataset and infrastructure will be of interest to researchers and developers working with biological image analysis, image segmentation and object tracking in general. BioMed Central 2009-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2777895/ /pubmed/19878606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368 Text en Copyright © 2009 Drelie Gelasca et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Database
Drelie Gelasca, Elisa
Obara, Boguslaw
Fedorov, Dmitry
Kvilekval, Kristian
Manjunath, BS
A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title_full A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title_fullStr A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title_full_unstemmed A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title_short A biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
title_sort biosegmentation benchmark for evaluation of bioimage analysis methods
topic Database
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-368
work_keys_str_mv AT dreliegelascaelisa abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT obaraboguslaw abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT fedorovdmitry abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT kvilekvalkristian abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT manjunathbs abiosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT dreliegelascaelisa biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT obaraboguslaw biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT fedorovdmitry biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT kvilekvalkristian biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods
AT manjunathbs biosegmentationbenchmarkforevaluationofbioimageanalysismethods