Cargando…

Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic

BACKGROUND: In Australia, national smoking prevalence has successfully fallen below 20%, but remains about 50% amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous tobacco control is framed by the idea that nothing has worked and a sense of either despondency or the difficulty of the challenge. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thomas, David P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-8-37
_version_ 1782174212971036672
author Thomas, David P
author_facet Thomas, David P
author_sort Thomas, David P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Australia, national smoking prevalence has successfully fallen below 20%, but remains about 50% amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous tobacco control is framed by the idea that nothing has worked and a sense of either despondency or the difficulty of the challenge. METHODS: This paper examines the trends in smoking prevalence of Australian Indigenous men and women aged 18 and over in three large national cross-sectional surveys in 1994, 2002 and 2004. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2004, Indigenous smoking prevalence fell by 5.5% and 3.5% in non-remote and remote men, and by 1.9% in non-remote women. In contrast, Indigenous smoking prevalence rose by 5.7% in remote women from 1994 to 2002, before falling by 0.8% between 2002 and 2004. Male and female Indigenous smoking prevalences in non-remote Australia fell in parallel with those in the total Australian population. The different Indigenous smoking prevalence trends in remote and non-remote Australia can be plausibly explained by the typical characteristics of national tobacco epidemic curves, with remote Indigenous Australia just at an earlier point in the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Reducing Indigenous smoking need not be considered exceptionally difficult. Inequities in the distribution of smoking related-deaths and illness may be reduced by increasing the exposure and access of Indigenous Australians, and other disadvantaged groups with high smoking prevalence, to proven tobacco control strategies.
format Text
id pubmed-2777908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27779082009-11-17 Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic Thomas, David P Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: In Australia, national smoking prevalence has successfully fallen below 20%, but remains about 50% amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous tobacco control is framed by the idea that nothing has worked and a sense of either despondency or the difficulty of the challenge. METHODS: This paper examines the trends in smoking prevalence of Australian Indigenous men and women aged 18 and over in three large national cross-sectional surveys in 1994, 2002 and 2004. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2004, Indigenous smoking prevalence fell by 5.5% and 3.5% in non-remote and remote men, and by 1.9% in non-remote women. In contrast, Indigenous smoking prevalence rose by 5.7% in remote women from 1994 to 2002, before falling by 0.8% between 2002 and 2004. Male and female Indigenous smoking prevalences in non-remote Australia fell in parallel with those in the total Australian population. The different Indigenous smoking prevalence trends in remote and non-remote Australia can be plausibly explained by the typical characteristics of national tobacco epidemic curves, with remote Indigenous Australia just at an earlier point in the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Reducing Indigenous smoking need not be considered exceptionally difficult. Inequities in the distribution of smoking related-deaths and illness may be reduced by increasing the exposure and access of Indigenous Australians, and other disadvantaged groups with high smoking prevalence, to proven tobacco control strategies. BioMed Central 2009-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2777908/ /pubmed/19878593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2009 Thomas; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Thomas, David P
Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title_full Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title_fullStr Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title_full_unstemmed Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title_short Smoking prevalence trends in Indigenous Australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
title_sort smoking prevalence trends in indigenous australians, 1994-2004: a typical rather than an exceptional epidemic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19878593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasdavidp smokingprevalencetrendsinindigenousaustralians19942004atypicalratherthananexceptionalepidemic