Cargando…

Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether a level of positive airway pressure was generated in participants receiving nasal high flow (NHF) delivered by the Optiflow™ system (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) in a cardiothoracic and vascular intens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parke, R., McGuinness, S., Eccleston, M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19846404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep280
_version_ 1782174216348499968
author Parke, R.
McGuinness, S.
Eccleston, M.
author_facet Parke, R.
McGuinness, S.
Eccleston, M.
author_sort Parke, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether a level of positive airway pressure was generated in participants receiving nasal high flow (NHF) delivered by the Optiflow™ system (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) in a cardiothoracic and vascular intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Nasopharyngeal airway pressure was measured in 15 postoperative cardiac surgery adult patients who received both NHF and standard facemask therapy at a flow rate of 35 litre min(−1). Measurements were repeated in the open mouth and closed mouth positions. Mean airway pressure was determined by averaging the pressures at the peak of inspiration of each breath within a 1 min period, allowing the entire pressure profile of each breath to be included within the calculation. RESULTS: Low level positive pressure was demonstrated with NHF at 35 litre min(−1) with mouth closed when compared with a facemask. NHF generated a mean nasopharyngeal airway pressure of mean (sd) 2.7 (1.04) cm H(2)O with the mouth closed. Airway pressure was significantly higher when breathing with mouth closed compared with mouth open (P≤0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a low level of positive pressure was generated with NHF at 35 litre min(−1) of gas flow. This is consistent with results obtained in healthy volunteers. Australian Clinical Trials Registry www.actr.org.au ACTRN012606000139572.
format Text
id pubmed-2777940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27779402009-11-17 Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure Parke, R. McGuinness, S. Eccleston, M. Br J Anaesth Respiration and the Airway BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether a level of positive airway pressure was generated in participants receiving nasal high flow (NHF) delivered by the Optiflow™ system (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) in a cardiothoracic and vascular intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Nasopharyngeal airway pressure was measured in 15 postoperative cardiac surgery adult patients who received both NHF and standard facemask therapy at a flow rate of 35 litre min(−1). Measurements were repeated in the open mouth and closed mouth positions. Mean airway pressure was determined by averaging the pressures at the peak of inspiration of each breath within a 1 min period, allowing the entire pressure profile of each breath to be included within the calculation. RESULTS: Low level positive pressure was demonstrated with NHF at 35 litre min(−1) with mouth closed when compared with a facemask. NHF generated a mean nasopharyngeal airway pressure of mean (sd) 2.7 (1.04) cm H(2)O with the mouth closed. Airway pressure was significantly higher when breathing with mouth closed compared with mouth open (P≤0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a low level of positive pressure was generated with NHF at 35 litre min(−1) of gas flow. This is consistent with results obtained in healthy volunteers. Australian Clinical Trials Registry www.actr.org.au ACTRN012606000139572. Oxford University Press 2009-12 2009-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2777940/ /pubmed/19846404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep280 Text en © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Respiration and the Airway
Parke, R.
McGuinness, S.
Eccleston, M.
Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title_full Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title_fullStr Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title_full_unstemmed Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title_short Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
title_sort nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure
topic Respiration and the Airway
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19846404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep280
work_keys_str_mv AT parker nasalhighflowtherapydeliverslowlevelpositiveairwaypressure
AT mcguinnesss nasalhighflowtherapydeliverslowlevelpositiveairwaypressure
AT ecclestonm nasalhighflowtherapydeliverslowlevelpositiveairwaypressure