Cargando…

Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of all forms of tobacco usage in adult Bangladeshis in relation to gender and locality. METHODS: Three annual urban and rural cross-sectional surveys were carried out between 2001 and 2003 involving a total of 35 446 adults, of whom 54.3% were female and 51.0% wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flora, M S, Mascie-Taylor, C G N, Rahman, M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19679888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.028142
_version_ 1782174219502616576
author Flora, M S
Mascie-Taylor, C G N
Rahman, M
author_facet Flora, M S
Mascie-Taylor, C G N
Rahman, M
author_sort Flora, M S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of all forms of tobacco usage in adult Bangladeshis in relation to gender and locality. METHODS: Three annual urban and rural cross-sectional surveys were carried out between 2001 and 2003 involving a total of 35 446 adults, of whom 54.3% were female and 51.0% were rural dwellers. Data were collected through interview using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall prevalences of smoking, chewing tobacco and gul usage were 20.5%, 20.6% and 1.8%, respectively. Current smoking and gul usage were significantly higher in males (42.2% and 2.2%, respectively) than females (2.3% and 1.5%, respectively) while chewing tobacco was more common in females (21.6%) than males (19.4%). No significant urban-rural difference was observed in smoking rate after adjusting for sociodemographic variables, while chewing tobacco was 1.5 times more likely to occur in rural residents and gul usage was 3.6 times more likely to occur in urban residents. On average a smoker consumed 9.3 sticks a day with males and rural residents smoking more. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of the population in Bangladesh use some form of tobacco. There are marked urban-rural and male-female differences. This difference is mainly accounted for by the higher prevalence of chewing tobacco in rural areas, rural female tobacco usage is close to double than the urban rate. Smoking rates were low in Bangladeshi females, more so in urban than rural areas. The tobacco awareness programme in Bangladesh might require putting emphasis on smokeless tobacco as well as smoking.
format Text
id pubmed-2778071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27780712009-11-18 Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis Flora, M S Mascie-Taylor, C G N Rahman, M Tob Control Research papers OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of all forms of tobacco usage in adult Bangladeshis in relation to gender and locality. METHODS: Three annual urban and rural cross-sectional surveys were carried out between 2001 and 2003 involving a total of 35 446 adults, of whom 54.3% were female and 51.0% were rural dwellers. Data were collected through interview using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall prevalences of smoking, chewing tobacco and gul usage were 20.5%, 20.6% and 1.8%, respectively. Current smoking and gul usage were significantly higher in males (42.2% and 2.2%, respectively) than females (2.3% and 1.5%, respectively) while chewing tobacco was more common in females (21.6%) than males (19.4%). No significant urban-rural difference was observed in smoking rate after adjusting for sociodemographic variables, while chewing tobacco was 1.5 times more likely to occur in rural residents and gul usage was 3.6 times more likely to occur in urban residents. On average a smoker consumed 9.3 sticks a day with males and rural residents smoking more. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of the population in Bangladesh use some form of tobacco. There are marked urban-rural and male-female differences. This difference is mainly accounted for by the higher prevalence of chewing tobacco in rural areas, rural female tobacco usage is close to double than the urban rate. Smoking rates were low in Bangladeshi females, more so in urban than rural areas. The tobacco awareness programme in Bangladesh might require putting emphasis on smokeless tobacco as well as smoking. BMJ Group 2009-12 2009-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2778071/ /pubmed/19679888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.028142 Text en © Flora et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research papers
Flora, M S
Mascie-Taylor, C G N
Rahman, M
Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title_full Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title_fullStr Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title_full_unstemmed Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title_short Gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult Bangladeshis
title_sort gender and locality differences in tobacco prevalence among adult bangladeshis
topic Research papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19679888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.028142
work_keys_str_mv AT florams genderandlocalitydifferencesintobaccoprevalenceamongadultbangladeshis
AT mascietaylorcgn genderandlocalitydifferencesintobaccoprevalenceamongadultbangladeshis
AT rahmanm genderandlocalitydifferencesintobaccoprevalenceamongadultbangladeshis