Cargando…

Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD

Aims. This study assessed whether recent screening recommendations have led to increased diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through routine screening. Methods. Respondents to the 2006 US SHIELD survey reported whether a physician told them they had T2DM, age at diagnosis, specialty of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodbard, Helena W., Green, Andrew J., Fox, Kathleen M., Grandy, Susan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/796206
_version_ 1782174235720941568
author Rodbard, Helena W.
Green, Andrew J.
Fox, Kathleen M.
Grandy, Susan
author_facet Rodbard, Helena W.
Green, Andrew J.
Fox, Kathleen M.
Grandy, Susan
author_sort Rodbard, Helena W.
collection PubMed
description Aims. This study assessed whether recent screening recommendations have led to increased diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through routine screening. Methods. Respondents to the 2006 US SHIELD survey reported whether a physician told them they had T2DM, age at diagnosis, specialty of the physician who made the diagnosis, and whether the diagnosis was made after having symptoms, during routine screening, or when being treated for another health problem. Results. Of 3 022 T2DM respondents, 36% of respondents reported that T2DM diagnosis was made during routine screening alone, 20% after having symptoms alone, and 6% when being treated for another health problem alone. The proportion of T2DM respondents reporting a diagnosis based only on screening increased approximately 42% over a 15+-year time span (absolute increase from 31% to 44%) (P < .001), whereas symptom-based diagnosis did not change significantly (P = .10). T2DM was diagnosed primarily by family physicians (88.3%). Conclusion. These findings highlight the importance of regular screening for diabetes and the vital role of primary care physicians in recognizing individuals with T2DM.
format Text
id pubmed-2778350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27783502009-12-10 Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD Rodbard, Helena W. Green, Andrew J. Fox, Kathleen M. Grandy, Susan Int J Endocrinol Research Article Aims. This study assessed whether recent screening recommendations have led to increased diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through routine screening. Methods. Respondents to the 2006 US SHIELD survey reported whether a physician told them they had T2DM, age at diagnosis, specialty of the physician who made the diagnosis, and whether the diagnosis was made after having symptoms, during routine screening, or when being treated for another health problem. Results. Of 3 022 T2DM respondents, 36% of respondents reported that T2DM diagnosis was made during routine screening alone, 20% after having symptoms alone, and 6% when being treated for another health problem alone. The proportion of T2DM respondents reporting a diagnosis based only on screening increased approximately 42% over a 15+-year time span (absolute increase from 31% to 44%) (P < .001), whereas symptom-based diagnosis did not change significantly (P = .10). T2DM was diagnosed primarily by family physicians (88.3%). Conclusion. These findings highlight the importance of regular screening for diabetes and the vital role of primary care physicians in recognizing individuals with T2DM. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2009 2009-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2778350/ /pubmed/20011059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/796206 Text en Copyright © 2009 Helena W. Rodbard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodbard, Helena W.
Green, Andrew J.
Fox, Kathleen M.
Grandy, Susan
Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title_full Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title_fullStr Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title_short Trends in Method of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from SHIELD
title_sort trends in method of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from shield
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/796206
work_keys_str_mv AT rodbardhelenaw trendsinmethodofdiagnosisoftype2diabetesmellitusresultsfromshield
AT greenandrewj trendsinmethodofdiagnosisoftype2diabetesmellitusresultsfromshield
AT foxkathleenm trendsinmethodofdiagnosisoftype2diabetesmellitusresultsfromshield
AT grandysusan trendsinmethodofdiagnosisoftype2diabetesmellitusresultsfromshield