Cargando…

Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which swallowing valproate (VP) tablets is an issue, the proportion of patients who would prefer an alternative formulation, and the predictors of preference. METHODS: A quantitative telephone survey of eligible adults (n = 400, ≥18 years old) who currently take...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhosle, Monali, Benner, Joshua S, DeKoven, Mitch, Shelton, Jeff
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936158
_version_ 1782174248204238848
author Bhosle, Monali
Benner, Joshua S
DeKoven, Mitch
Shelton, Jeff
author_facet Bhosle, Monali
Benner, Joshua S
DeKoven, Mitch
Shelton, Jeff
author_sort Bhosle, Monali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which swallowing valproate (VP) tablets is an issue, the proportion of patients who would prefer an alternative formulation, and the predictors of preference. METHODS: A quantitative telephone survey of eligible adults (n = 400, ≥18 years old) who currently take (n = 236) or previously took (n = 164) VP tablets within the past 6 months was conducted. RESULTS: More than half of the patients indicated that VP tablets were ‘uncomfortable to swallow’ (68.5%, n = 274) and were ‘very interested’ (65.8%, n = 263) in medications that were easier to swallow. When choosing conceptually between taking VP tablet once/day or an equally safe and effective but significantly smaller soft gel capsule twice per day, the 82.8%, (n = 331) preferred the soft gel capsule. In the multivariate regression analysis, perceiving soft gel capsules to be easier to swallow (OR = 73.54; 95% CI = 15.01 to 360.40) and taking VP more frequently (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.13 to 3.61) were significant predictors of soft gel capsule treatment preference. CONCLUSION: VP users would prefer a formulation that is easier to swallow, even if it is needed to be taken twice per day. When choosing between medications with similar efficacy and safety, physicians can consider patient preferences to optimize conditions for medication adherence.
format Text
id pubmed-2778440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27784402009-11-23 Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations Bhosle, Monali Benner, Joshua S DeKoven, Mitch Shelton, Jeff Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which swallowing valproate (VP) tablets is an issue, the proportion of patients who would prefer an alternative formulation, and the predictors of preference. METHODS: A quantitative telephone survey of eligible adults (n = 400, ≥18 years old) who currently take (n = 236) or previously took (n = 164) VP tablets within the past 6 months was conducted. RESULTS: More than half of the patients indicated that VP tablets were ‘uncomfortable to swallow’ (68.5%, n = 274) and were ‘very interested’ (65.8%, n = 263) in medications that were easier to swallow. When choosing conceptually between taking VP tablet once/day or an equally safe and effective but significantly smaller soft gel capsule twice per day, the 82.8%, (n = 331) preferred the soft gel capsule. In the multivariate regression analysis, perceiving soft gel capsules to be easier to swallow (OR = 73.54; 95% CI = 15.01 to 360.40) and taking VP more frequently (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.13 to 3.61) were significant predictors of soft gel capsule treatment preference. CONCLUSION: VP users would prefer a formulation that is easier to swallow, even if it is needed to be taken twice per day. When choosing between medications with similar efficacy and safety, physicians can consider patient preferences to optimize conditions for medication adherence. Dove Medical Press 2009-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2778440/ /pubmed/19936158 Text en © 2009 Bhosle et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bhosle, Monali
Benner, Joshua S
DeKoven, Mitch
Shelton, Jeff
Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title_full Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title_fullStr Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title_full_unstemmed Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title_short Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
title_sort difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936158
work_keys_str_mv AT bhoslemonali difficulttoswallowpatientpreferencesforalternativevalproatepharmaceuticalformulations
AT bennerjoshuas difficulttoswallowpatientpreferencesforalternativevalproatepharmaceuticalformulations
AT dekovenmitch difficulttoswallowpatientpreferencesforalternativevalproatepharmaceuticalformulations
AT sheltonjeff difficulttoswallowpatientpreferencesforalternativevalproatepharmaceuticalformulations