Cargando…

An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1

BACKGROUND: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association in 1975 (JOA score), and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients’ satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukui, Mitsuru, Chiba, Kazuhiro, Kawakami, Mamoru, Kikuchi, Shin-ichi, Konno, Shin-ichi, Miyamoto, Masabumi, Seichi, Atsushi, Shimamura, Tadashi, Shirado, Osamu, Taguchi, Toshihiko, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Takeshita, Katsushi, Tani, Toshikazu, Toyama, Yoshiaki, Wada, Eiji, Yonenobu, Kazuo, Tanaka, Takashi, Hirota, Yoshio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1118-1
_version_ 1782174294506209280
author Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Konno, Shin-ichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Wada, Eiji
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
author_facet Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Konno, Shin-ichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Wada, Eiji
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
author_sort Fukui, Mitsuru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association in 1975 (JOA score), and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients’ satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health, which can be affected by cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study was to develop a new outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy. METHODS: This study was conducted in eight university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals from February to May 2002. The questionnaire included 77 items. Forty-one questions, which were originally listed by the authors, were for evaluation of the physical function of the cervical spine and spinal cord. The Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) was used to examine health-related quality of life (QOL). Patients with cervical myelopathy and healthy volunteers were recruited at each institution. After analysis of the answers from patients and volunteers, irrelevant questions using the following criteria were excluded: (1) a question 80% of answers for which were concentrated on one choice, (2) a question whose answer was highly correlated with that of other questions, (3) a question that could be explained by other questions, and (4) a question for which the distribution of the answers obtained from the patients was not different from that obtained from the normal volunteers. RESULTS: The patients comprised 164 men and 86 women, and the healthy volunteers 96 men and 120 women. Thirteen items from the questions about the physical functions of the cervical spine and the spinal cord and 11 items from SF-36 remained as candidates that should be included in the final outcome measure questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four questions remained as candidates for the final questionnaire. This new self-administered questionnaire might be used to evaluate the outcomes in patients with cervical myelopathy more efficiently.
format Text
id pubmed-2778723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27787232009-11-20 An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1 Fukui, Mitsuru Chiba, Kazuhiro Kawakami, Mamoru Kikuchi, Shin-ichi Konno, Shin-ichi Miyamoto, Masabumi Seichi, Atsushi Shimamura, Tadashi Shirado, Osamu Taguchi, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kazuhisa Takeshita, Katsushi Tani, Toshikazu Toyama, Yoshiaki Wada, Eiji Yonenobu, Kazuo Tanaka, Takashi Hirota, Yoshio J Orthop Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association in 1975 (JOA score), and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients’ satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health, which can be affected by cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study was to develop a new outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy. METHODS: This study was conducted in eight university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals from February to May 2002. The questionnaire included 77 items. Forty-one questions, which were originally listed by the authors, were for evaluation of the physical function of the cervical spine and spinal cord. The Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) was used to examine health-related quality of life (QOL). Patients with cervical myelopathy and healthy volunteers were recruited at each institution. After analysis of the answers from patients and volunteers, irrelevant questions using the following criteria were excluded: (1) a question 80% of answers for which were concentrated on one choice, (2) a question whose answer was highly correlated with that of other questions, (3) a question that could be explained by other questions, and (4) a question for which the distribution of the answers obtained from the patients was not different from that obtained from the normal volunteers. RESULTS: The patients comprised 164 men and 86 women, and the healthy volunteers 96 men and 120 women. Thirteen items from the questions about the physical functions of the cervical spine and the spinal cord and 11 items from SF-36 remained as candidates that should be included in the final outcome measure questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four questions remained as candidates for the final questionnaire. This new self-administered questionnaire might be used to evaluate the outcomes in patients with cervical myelopathy more efficiently. Springer-Verlag 2007-05-31 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2778723/ /pubmed/17530374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1118-1 Text en © The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Fukui, Mitsuru
Chiba, Kazuhiro
Kawakami, Mamoru
Kikuchi, Shin-ichi
Konno, Shin-ichi
Miyamoto, Masabumi
Seichi, Atsushi
Shimamura, Tadashi
Shirado, Osamu
Taguchi, Toshihiko
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Takeshita, Katsushi
Tani, Toshikazu
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Wada, Eiji
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Tanaka, Takashi
Hirota, Yoshio
An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title_full An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title_fullStr An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title_full_unstemmed An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title_short An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1
title_sort outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (joacmeq): part 1
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1118-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fukuimitsuru anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT chibakazuhiro anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT kawakamimamoru anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT kikuchishinichi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT konnoshinichi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT miyamotomasabumi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT seichiatsushi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT shimamuratadashi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT shiradoosamu anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT taguchitoshihiko anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT takahashikazuhisa anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT takeshitakatsushi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT tanitoshikazu anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT toyamayoshiaki anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT wadaeiji anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT yonenobukazuo anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT tanakatakashi anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT hirotayoshio anoutcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT fukuimitsuru outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT chibakazuhiro outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT kawakamimamoru outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT kikuchishinichi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT konnoshinichi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT miyamotomasabumi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT seichiatsushi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT shimamuratadashi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT shiradoosamu outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT taguchitoshihiko outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT takahashikazuhisa outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT takeshitakatsushi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT tanitoshikazu outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT toyamayoshiaki outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT wadaeiji outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT yonenobukazuo outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT tanakatakashi outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1
AT hirotayoshio outcomemeasureforpatientswithcervicalmyelopathyjapaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqpart1