Cargando…
Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science?
This is a reaction to Borsboom’s (2006) discussion paper on the issue that psychology takes so little notice of the modern developments in psychometrics, in particular, latent variable methods. Contrary to Borsboom, it is argued that latent variables are summaries of interesting data properties, tha...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1497-9 |
_version_ | 1782174391675650048 |
---|---|
author | Sijtsma, Klaas |
author_facet | Sijtsma, Klaas |
author_sort | Sijtsma, Klaas |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is a reaction to Borsboom’s (2006) discussion paper on the issue that psychology takes so little notice of the modern developments in psychometrics, in particular, latent variable methods. Contrary to Borsboom, it is argued that latent variables are summaries of interesting data properties, that construct validation should involve studying nomological networks, that psychological research slowly but definitely will incorporate latent variable methods, and that the role of psychometrics in psychology is that of partner, not role model. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2779408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27794082009-11-23 Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? Sijtsma, Klaas Psychometrika Article This is a reaction to Borsboom’s (2006) discussion paper on the issue that psychology takes so little notice of the modern developments in psychometrics, in particular, latent variable methods. Contrary to Borsboom, it is argued that latent variables are summaries of interesting data properties, that construct validation should involve studying nomological networks, that psychological research slowly but definitely will incorporate latent variable methods, and that the role of psychometrics in psychology is that of partner, not role model. Springer Netherlands 2006-09-23 2006-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2779408/ /pubmed/19946652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1497-9 Text en © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006 |
spellingShingle | Article Sijtsma, Klaas Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title | Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title_full | Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title_fullStr | Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title_short | Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science? |
title_sort | psychometrics in psychological research: role model or partner in science? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1497-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sijtsmaklaas psychometricsinpsychologicalresearchrolemodelorpartnerinscience |