Cargando…

When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest

Borsboom (2006) attacks psychologists for failing to incorporate psychometric advances in their work, discusses factors that contribute to this regrettable situation, and offers suggestions for ameliorating it. This commentary applauds Borsboom for calling the field to task on this issue and notes a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Clark, Lee Anna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1500-5
_version_ 1782174391900045312
author Clark, Lee Anna
author_facet Clark, Lee Anna
author_sort Clark, Lee Anna
collection PubMed
description Borsboom (2006) attacks psychologists for failing to incorporate psychometric advances in their work, discusses factors that contribute to this regrettable situation, and offers suggestions for ameliorating it. This commentary applauds Borsboom for calling the field to task on this issue and notes additional problems in the field regarding measurement that he could add to his critique. It also chastises Borsboom for occasionally being unnecessarily perjorative in his critique, noting that negative rhetoric is unlikely to make converts of offenders. Finally, it exhorts psychometricians to make their work more accessible and points to Borsboom, Mellenbergh, and Van Heerden (2003) as an excellent example of how this can be done.
format Text
id pubmed-2779409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27794092009-11-23 When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest Clark, Lee Anna Psychometrika Article Borsboom (2006) attacks psychologists for failing to incorporate psychometric advances in their work, discusses factors that contribute to this regrettable situation, and offers suggestions for ameliorating it. This commentary applauds Borsboom for calling the field to task on this issue and notes additional problems in the field regarding measurement that he could add to his critique. It also chastises Borsboom for occasionally being unnecessarily perjorative in his critique, noting that negative rhetoric is unlikely to make converts of offenders. Finally, it exhorts psychometricians to make their work more accessible and points to Borsboom, Mellenbergh, and Van Heerden (2003) as an excellent example of how this can be done. Springer Netherlands 2006-09-23 2006-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2779409/ /pubmed/19946653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1500-5 Text en © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006
spellingShingle Article
Clark, Lee Anna
When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title_full When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title_fullStr When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title_full_unstemmed When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title_short When a Psychometric Advance Falls in the Forest
title_sort when a psychometric advance falls in the forest
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19946653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1500-5
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkleeanna whenapsychometricadvancefallsintheforest