Cargando…

Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data

PURPOSE: Patient motion during PET acquisition may affect measured time-activity curves, thereby reducing accuracy of tracer kinetic analyses. The aim of the present study was to evaluate different off-line frame-by-frame methods to correct patient motion, which is of particular interest when no opt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mourik, Jurgen E. M., Lubberink, Mark, van Velden, Floris H. P., Lammertsma, Adriaan A., Boellaard, Ronald
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19585116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1193-y
_version_ 1782174397292871680
author Mourik, Jurgen E. M.
Lubberink, Mark
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Boellaard, Ronald
author_facet Mourik, Jurgen E. M.
Lubberink, Mark
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Boellaard, Ronald
author_sort Mourik, Jurgen E. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patient motion during PET acquisition may affect measured time-activity curves, thereby reducing accuracy of tracer kinetic analyses. The aim of the present study was to evaluate different off-line frame-by-frame methods to correct patient motion, which is of particular interest when no optical motion tracking system is available or when older data sets have to be reanalysed. METHODS: Four different motion correction methods were evaluated. In the first method attenuation-corrected frames were realigned with the summed image of the first 3 min. The second method was identical, except that non-attenuation-corrected images were used. In the third and fourth methods non-attenuation-corrected images were realigned with standard and cupped transmission images, respectively. Two simulation studies were performed, based on [(11)C]flumazenil and (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 data sets, respectively. For both simulation studies different types (rotational, translational) and degrees of motion were added. Simulated PET scans were corrected for motion using all correction methods. The optimal method derived from these simulation studies was used to evaluate two (one with and one without visible movement) clinical data sets of [(11)C]flumazenil, (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 and [(11)C]PIB. For these clinical data sets, the volume of distribution (V(T)) was derived using Logan analysis and values were compared before and after motion correction. RESULTS: For both [(11)C]flumazenil and (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 simulation studies, optimal results were obtained when realignment was based on non-attenuation-corrected images. For the clinical data sets motion disappeared visually after motion correction. Regional differences of up to 433% in V(T) before and after motion correction were found for scans with visible movement. On the other hand, when no visual motion was present in the original data set, overall differences in V(T) before and after motion correction were <1.5 ± 1.3%. CONCLUSION: Frame-by-frame motion correction using non-attenuation-corrected images improves the accuracy of tracer kinetic analysis compared to non-motion-corrected data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-009-1193-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
format Text
id pubmed-2779434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27794342009-11-23 Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data Mourik, Jurgen E. M. Lubberink, Mark van Velden, Floris H. P. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Boellaard, Ronald Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Patient motion during PET acquisition may affect measured time-activity curves, thereby reducing accuracy of tracer kinetic analyses. The aim of the present study was to evaluate different off-line frame-by-frame methods to correct patient motion, which is of particular interest when no optical motion tracking system is available or when older data sets have to be reanalysed. METHODS: Four different motion correction methods were evaluated. In the first method attenuation-corrected frames were realigned with the summed image of the first 3 min. The second method was identical, except that non-attenuation-corrected images were used. In the third and fourth methods non-attenuation-corrected images were realigned with standard and cupped transmission images, respectively. Two simulation studies were performed, based on [(11)C]flumazenil and (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 data sets, respectively. For both simulation studies different types (rotational, translational) and degrees of motion were added. Simulated PET scans were corrected for motion using all correction methods. The optimal method derived from these simulation studies was used to evaluate two (one with and one without visible movement) clinical data sets of [(11)C]flumazenil, (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 and [(11)C]PIB. For these clinical data sets, the volume of distribution (V(T)) was derived using Logan analysis and values were compared before and after motion correction. RESULTS: For both [(11)C]flumazenil and (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 simulation studies, optimal results were obtained when realignment was based on non-attenuation-corrected images. For the clinical data sets motion disappeared visually after motion correction. Regional differences of up to 433% in V(T) before and after motion correction were found for scans with visible movement. On the other hand, when no visual motion was present in the original data set, overall differences in V(T) before and after motion correction were <1.5 ± 1.3%. CONCLUSION: Frame-by-frame motion correction using non-attenuation-corrected images improves the accuracy of tracer kinetic analysis compared to non-motion-corrected data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-009-1193-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer-Verlag 2009-07-08 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2779434/ /pubmed/19585116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1193-y Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mourik, Jurgen E. M.
Lubberink, Mark
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
Boellaard, Ronald
Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title_full Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title_fullStr Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title_full_unstemmed Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title_short Off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame PET data
title_sort off-line motion correction methods for multi-frame pet data
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19585116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1193-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mourikjurgenem offlinemotioncorrectionmethodsformultiframepetdata
AT lubberinkmark offlinemotioncorrectionmethodsformultiframepetdata
AT vanveldenflorishp offlinemotioncorrectionmethodsformultiframepetdata
AT lammertsmaadriaana offlinemotioncorrectionmethodsformultiframepetdata
AT boellaardronald offlinemotioncorrectionmethodsformultiframepetdata