Cargando…

Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of information about the ways in which standardized patients (SPs) are used, how programs that facilitate their use are operated, the ways in which SP-based performance assessments are developed, and how assessment quality is assured. This survey research projec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howley, Lisa D., Gliva-McConvey, Gayle, Thornton, Judy
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Education Online 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2009.F0000208
_version_ 1782174420409778176
author Howley, Lisa D.
Gliva-McConvey, Gayle
Thornton, Judy
author_facet Howley, Lisa D.
Gliva-McConvey, Gayle
Thornton, Judy
author_sort Howley, Lisa D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of information about the ways in which standardized patients (SPs) are used, how programs that facilitate their use are operated, the ways in which SP-based performance assessments are developed, and how assessment quality is assured. This survey research project was undertaken to describe the current practices of programs delivering SP-based instruction and/or assessment. METHOD: A structured interview of 61 individual SP programs affiliated with the Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) was conducted over a 7-month period. A web-based data entry system was used by the 11 trained interviewers. RESULTS: The two most common reported uses of SPs were learner performance assessment (88% of respondents) and small-group instruction (84% of respondents). Fifty-four percent of programs hired 51–100 SPs annually and paid an average of $15 and $16 per hour for training time and portraying a case, respectively. The average reported number of permanent program employees, excluding SPs and temporary staff, was 4.8 (sd = 3.6). The most frequently reported salary range was $30,001–$45,000. CONCLUSION: We intend for these preliminary results to inform the medical education community about the functions of SPs and the structures of programs that implement these complex educational endeavors.
format Text
id pubmed-2779617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medical Education Online
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27796172010-01-14 Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools Howley, Lisa D. Gliva-McConvey, Gayle Thornton, Judy Med Educ Online Feature Article BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of information about the ways in which standardized patients (SPs) are used, how programs that facilitate their use are operated, the ways in which SP-based performance assessments are developed, and how assessment quality is assured. This survey research project was undertaken to describe the current practices of programs delivering SP-based instruction and/or assessment. METHOD: A structured interview of 61 individual SP programs affiliated with the Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) was conducted over a 7-month period. A web-based data entry system was used by the 11 trained interviewers. RESULTS: The two most common reported uses of SPs were learner performance assessment (88% of respondents) and small-group instruction (84% of respondents). Fifty-four percent of programs hired 51–100 SPs annually and paid an average of $15 and $16 per hour for training time and portraying a case, respectively. The average reported number of permanent program employees, excluding SPs and temporary staff, was 4.8 (sd = 3.6). The most frequently reported salary range was $30,001–$45,000. CONCLUSION: We intend for these preliminary results to inform the medical education community about the functions of SPs and the structures of programs that implement these complex educational endeavors. Medical Education Online 2009-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2779617/ /pubmed/20165521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2009.F0000208 Text en © 2009 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Material in Medical Education Online is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
spellingShingle Feature Article
Howley, Lisa D.
Gliva-McConvey, Gayle
Thornton, Judy
Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title_full Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title_fullStr Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title_full_unstemmed Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title_short Standardized Patient Practices: Initial Report on the Survey of US and Canadian Medical Schools
title_sort standardized patient practices: initial report on the survey of us and canadian medical schools
topic Feature Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2009.F0000208
work_keys_str_mv AT howleylisad standardizedpatientpracticesinitialreportonthesurveyofusandcanadianmedicalschools
AT glivamcconveygayle standardizedpatientpracticesinitialreportonthesurveyofusandcanadianmedicalschools
AT thorntonjudy standardizedpatientpracticesinitialreportonthesurveyofusandcanadianmedicalschools